[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69033c55.df0a0220.1a33d7.49ff@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 11:22:11 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] err.h: add ERR_PTR_CONST macro
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:27:38AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:38:53PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 05:32:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 02:33:19PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > > Add ERR_PTR_CONST macro to initialize global variables with error
> > > 
> > > ERR_PTR_CONST()
> > > 
> > > > pointers. This might be useful for specific case where there is a global
> > > > variables initialized to an error condition and then later set to the
> > > > real handle once probe finish/completes.
> > > 
> > > Okay, this has two caveats:
> > > 
> > > 1) naming is bad as it suggests something about const qualifier (and not, it's
> > > not about that at all);
> > > 
> > > 2) it doesn't explain what's wrong with ERR_PTR().
> > >
> > 
> > It can't be used for global variables as it does cause compilation
> > error.
> 
> Can you show an example, please?
>
drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c:361:35: error: initializer element is not constant
  361 | static struct qcom_smem *__smem = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
      |                                   ^~~~~~~
make[9]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: drivers/soc/qcom/smem.o] Error 1
You want me to add this to the commit? Or any hint to better reword this
so it's more understandable?
> > I wanted to use ERR_PTR to set the __smem handle instead of freecode
> > (void *) -EPROBE_DEFER and notice the compiler doesn't like using
> > ERR_PTR().
> > 
> > Then the problem is clear as static declaration require constant value
> > for initialization and ERR_PTR is a inline function.
> > 
> > This is why ERR_PTR_CONST following the pattern that was used for
> > FIELD_PREP -> FIELD_PREP_CONST that was also introduced for similar
> > case.
> > 
> > So yes this is specific for case of static global variables.
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 
-- 
	Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
