[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a8e8e43-c86f-4c46-851b-858e5deec8ac@riscstar.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 19:10:06 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, dlan@...too.org, guodong@...cstar.com,
pjw@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, alex@...ti.fr,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, christian.bruel@...s.st.com, shradha.t@...sung.com,
krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com, qiang.yu@....qualcomm.com,
namcao@...utronix.de, thippeswamy.havalige@....com, inochiama@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, spacemit@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] dt-bindings: pci: spacemit: introduce PCIe host
controller
On 10/28/25 12:58 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 05:24:33PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>> On 10/26/25 11:38 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 10:35:20AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>>>> Add the Device Tree binding for the PCIe root complex found on the
>>>> SpacemiT K1 SoC. This device is derived from the Synopsys Designware
>>>> PCIe IP. It supports up to three PCIe ports operating at PCIe gen 2
>>>> link speeds (5 GT/sec). One of the ports uses a combo PHY, which is
>>>> typically used to support a USB 3 port.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: - Renamed the binding, using "host controller"
>>>> - Added '>' to the description, and reworded it a bit
>>>> - Added reference to /schemas/pci/snps,dw-pcie.yaml
>>>> - Fixed and renamed the compatible string
>>>> - Renamed the PMU property, and fixed its description
>>>> - Consistently omit the period at the end of descriptions
>>>> - Renamed the "global" clock to be "phy"
>>>> - Use interrupts rather than interrupts-extended, and name the
>>>> one interrupt "msi" to make clear its purpose
>>>> - Added a vpcie3v3-supply property
>>>> - Dropped the max-link-speed property
>>>> - Changed additionalProperties to unevaluatedProperties
>>>> - Dropped the label and status property from the example
>>>>
>>>> .../bindings/pci/spacemit,k1-pcie-host.yaml | 156 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 156 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/spacemit,k1-pcie-host.yaml
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/spacemit,k1-pcie-host.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/spacemit,k1-pcie-host.yaml
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000000000..87745d49c53a1
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/spacemit,k1-pcie-host.yaml
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>>> +---
>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/spacemit,k1-pcie-host.yaml#
>>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>> +
>>>> +title: SpacemiT K1 PCI Express Host Controller
. . .
>>>> + interrupt-names:
>>>> + const: msi
>>>> +
>>>> + phys:
>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>> +
>>>> + vpcie3v3-supply:
>>>> + description:
>>>> + A phandle for 3.3v regulator to use for PCIe
>>>
>>> Could you please move these Root Port specific properties (phy, vpcie3v3-supply)
>>> to the Root Port node?
>>>
>>> Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/st,stm32-pcie-host.yaml
>>
>> OK, I'll try to follow what that ST binding does (and the
>> matching driver).
>>
>>> For handling the 'vpcie3v3-supply', you can rely on PCI_PWRCTRL_SLOT driver.
>> I looked at the code under pci/pwrctrl. But is there some other
>> documentation I should be looking at for this?
>>
>
> Sorry, nothing available atm. But I will create one, once we fix some core
> issues with pwrctrl so that it becomes useable for all (more in the driver
> patch).
Sounds good, I think it's necessary. I might not get it completely
right on the next try but I trust you'll help me understand what I
need to do.
>> It looks like it involves creating a new node compatible with
>> "pciclass,0604". And that the purpose of that driver was to
>> ensure certain resources are enabled before the "real" PCI
>> device gets probed.
>>
>> I see two arm64 DTS files using it: x1e80100.dtsi and r8a779g0.dtsi.
>> Both define this node inside the main PCIe controller node.
>>
>> Will this model (with the parent pwrctrl node and child PCI
>> controller node) be used for all PCI controllers from here on?
>>
>
> The PCI controller (host bridge) node is the parent and the Root Port node
> (which gets bind to pwrctrl slot driver) will be the child.
That makes sense to me.
>> Or are you saying this properly represents the relationship of
>> the supply with the PCIe port in this SpacemiT case?
>>
>
> We want to use this for all the new platforms and also try to convert the old
> ones too gradually.
OK, understood.
Thank you.
-Alex
>
> - Mani
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists