lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176192142809.427883.385396429453219228.b4-ty@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 20:10:53 +0530
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Aniket Limaye
	<a-limaye@...com>
CC: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <u-kumar1@...com>, <gehariprasath@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Fix I2C pinmux pull configuration

Hi Aniket Limaye,

On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 17:56:33 +0530, Aniket Limaye wrote:
> The I2C pins for some of the instances on J784S4/J742S2/AM69 are
> configured as PIN_INPUT_PULLUP while these pins are open-drain type and
> do not support internal pull-ups [0][1][2]. The pullup configuration
> bits in the corresponding padconfig registers are reserved and any
> writes to them have no effect and readback checks on those bits fail.
> 
> Update the pinmux settings to use PIN_INPUT instead of PIN_INPUT_PULLUP
> to reflect the correct hardware behaviour.
> 
> [...]

I have applied the following to branch ti-next on [1].
Thank you!

[1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Fix I2C pinmux pull configuration
      commit: 671c852fc53d1b6f5eccdb03c1889a484c9d1996

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Vignesh


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ