linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Ensure clear_page() variants always have __kcfi_typeid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251031144624.GHaQTLwONX3j6aDkkP@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:46:24 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Ensure clear_page() variants always have
 __kcfi_typeid_ symbols

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:20:44AM -0400, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> These errors occur in Linus's tree so could this go before that one then
> it could just update the instances of KCFI_ADDRESSABLE? I don't have a
> strong opinion, I found these series of errors tangentially but this
> feels like something that could go via x86/urgent and that series could
> just rebase on it.

Sure, that works too.

I guess we want that in stable too, considering where the Fixes: tag commit
landed...?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette