[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251031-smartness-cattishly-465de28ec20b@spud>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:08:04 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Buday Csaba <buday.csaba@...lan.hu>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: ethernet-phy: clarify when compatible
must specify PHY ID
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 02:01:26PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 09:15:06AM +0100, Buday Csaba wrote:
> > Change PHY ID description in ethernet-phy.yaml to clarify that a
> > PHY ID is required (may -> must) when the PHY requires special
> > initialization sequence.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20251026212026.GA2959311-robh@kernel.org/
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aQIZvDt5gooZSTcp@debianbuilder/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Buday Csaba <buday.csaba@...lan.hu>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > index 2ec2d9fda..6f5599902 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > @@ -35,9 +35,10 @@ properties:
> > description: PHYs that implement IEEE802.3 clause 45
> > - pattern: "^ethernet-phy-id[a-f0-9]{4}\\.[a-f0-9]{4}$"
> > description:
> > - If the PHY reports an incorrect ID (or none at all) then the
> > - compatible list may contain an entry with the correct PHY ID
> > - in the above form.
> > + If the PHY reports an incorrect ID (or none at all), or the PHY
> > + requires a specific initialization sequence (like a particular
> > + order of clocks, resets, power supplies), then the compatible list
> > + must contain an entry with the correct PHY ID in the above form.
>
> That is good start, but how about:
>
> PHYs contain identification registers. These will be read to
> identify the PHY. If the PHY reports an incorrect ID, or the
> PHY requires a specific initialization sequence (like a
> particular order of clocks, resets, power supplies), in
> order to be able to read the ID registers, then the
> compatible list must contain an entry with the correct PHY
> ID in the above form.
>
> The first two sentences make it clear we ideally use the ID registers.
> Then we say what happens if cannot work.
>
> The "(or none at all)" is exactly the case you are trying to clarify,
> it does not respond due to missing reset, clocks etc. We don't need to
> say it twice, so i removed it.
I like this wording,
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
pw-bot: changes-requested
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists