[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2dd26f37-7a42-44b3-8902-5c6b5492655a@web.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 16:34:59 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@....qualcomm.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>,
Carl Vanderlip <carl.vanderlip@....qualcomm.com>,
Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>,
Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@...cinc.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: Use pointer from memcpy() call for assignment
in copy_partial_exec_reqs()
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:26:33 +0100
…>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>
> This does not match the address this patch was received from, therefore DCO does not appear to be satisfied. I cannot accept this.
I find such a change rejection questionable.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc3#n409
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists