[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251031154107.403054-1-kafai.wan@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 23:41:05 +0800
From: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@...ux.dev>
To: ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org,
paul.chaignon@...il.com,
m.shachnai@...il.com,
henriette.herzog@....de,
kafai.wan@...ux.dev,
luis.gerhorst@....de,
harishankar.vishwanathan@...il.com,
colin.i.king@...il.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] bpf: Skip bounds adjustment for conditional jumps on same scalar register
This small patchset is about avoid verifier bug warning when conditional
jumps on same register when the register holds a scalar with range.
v3:
- Enhance is_scalar_branch_taken() to handle scalar case. (Eduard)
- Update the selftest to cover all conditional jump opcodes. (Eduard)
v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251025053017.2308823-1-kafai.wan@linux.dev/
- Enhance is_branch_taken() and is_scalar_branch_taken() to handle
branch direction computation for same register. (Eduard and Alexei)
- Update the selftest.
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251022164457.1203756-1-kafai.wan@linux.dev/
---
KaFai Wan (2):
bpf: Skip bounds adjustment for conditional jumps on same scalar
register
selftests/bpf: Add test for conditional jumps on same scalar register
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 33 ++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 187 insertions(+)
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists