[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251031165417.4490941a@pumpkin>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 16:54:17 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device_cgroup: Replace strcpy/sprintf in set_majmin
On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 16:23:02 +0100
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev> wrote:
> On 31. Oct 2025, at 13:59, David Laight wrote:
> > Even if ex->major can be ~0 there are much cleaner ways of writing this code.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. Looking at the bigger picture makes it
> clear that most of the code can actually be removed. What do you think
> of this change?
That is sort of what I was thinking about, but it doesn't quite work.
>
> Thanks,
> Thorsten
>
> diff --git a/security/device_cgroup.c b/security/device_cgroup.c
> index a41f558f6fdd..cb845b1fad6b 100644
> --- a/security/device_cgroup.c
> +++ b/security/device_cgroup.c
> @@ -244,7 +244,6 @@ static void devcgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> #define DEVCG_DENY 2
> #define DEVCG_LIST 3
>
> -#define MAJMINLEN 13
> #define ACCLEN 4
>
> static void set_access(char *acc, short access)
> @@ -270,19 +269,11 @@ static char type_to_char(short type)
> return 'X';
> }
>
> -static void set_majmin(char *str, unsigned m)
> -{
> - if (m == ~0)
> - strscpy(str, "*", MAJMINLEN);
> - else
> - snprintf(str, MAJMINLEN, "%u", m);
> -}
> -
> static int devcgroup_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> struct dev_cgroup *devcgroup = css_to_devcgroup(seq_css(m));
> struct dev_exception_item *ex;
> - char maj[MAJMINLEN], min[MAJMINLEN], acc[ACCLEN];
> + char acc[ACCLEN];
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> /*
> @@ -293,17 +284,12 @@ static int devcgroup_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> */
> if (devcgroup->behavior == DEVCG_DEFAULT_ALLOW) {
> set_access(acc, DEVCG_ACC_MASK);
> - set_majmin(maj, ~0);
> - set_majmin(min, ~0);
> - seq_printf(m, "%c %s:%s %s\n", type_to_char(DEVCG_DEV_ALL),
> - maj, min, acc);
> + seq_printf(m, "%c *:* %s\n", type_to_char(DEVCG_DEV_ALL), acc);
type_to_char(DEVCG_DEV_ALL) is 'a' and this is the only place it happens,
also acc is "rwm".
So that could be:
seq_puts(m, "a *:* rwm\n");
> } else {
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(ex, &devcgroup->exceptions, list) {
> set_access(acc, ex->access);
> - set_majmin(maj, ex->major);
> - set_majmin(min, ex->minor);
> - seq_printf(m, "%c %s:%s %s\n", type_to_char(ex->type),
> - maj, min, acc);
> + seq_printf(m, "%c %u:%u %s\n", type_to_char(ex->type),
> + ex->major, ex->minor, acc);
It looks like both ex->major and ex->minor can be ~0.
(I'm not sure it makes any sense to have major == ~0 and minor != ~0).
However this should be ok:
seq_putc(m, type_to_char(ex->type);
if (ex->major == ~0)
seq_puts(m, " *:");
else
seq_printf(m, " %u:", ex->major);
if (ex->minor == ~0)
seq_puts(m, "* ");
else
seq_printf(m, "%u ", ex->minor);
if (ex->access & DEVCG_ACC_READ)
seq_putc(m, 'r');
if (ex->access & DEVCG_ACC_WRITE)
seq_putc(m, 'w');
if (ex->access & DEV_ACC_MKNOD)
seq_putc(m. 'm');
seq_putc(m, '\n');
A less intrusive change would be to pass 'm' the the set_xxx() functions
and add the separators between the calls.
David
> }
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists