[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251031164958.29f75595@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 16:49:58 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, Pablo Neira Ayuso
<pablo@...filter.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de
Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
<mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian
Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] treewide: Rename ERR_PTR_PCPU() -->
PCPU_ERR_PTR()
On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:35:53 +0100 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Make the namespace of specific ERR_PTR() macro leading the thing.
> This is already done for IOMEM_ERR_PTR(). Follow the same pattern
> in PCPU_ERR_PTR().
TBH I find the current naming to be typical. _PCPU() is the "flavor" of
the API. Same as we usually append _rcu() to functions which expect
to operate under RCU. All error pointer helpers end with _PCPU().
I don't feel strongly so fine if anyone else wants to apply this.
But I will not :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists