lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251031043436.55929-1-desnesn@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 01:34:36 -0300
From: Desnes Nunes <desnesn@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	Desnes Nunes <desnesn@...hat.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] usb: storage: Fix memory leak in USB bulk transport

A kernel memory leak was identified by the 'ioctl_sg01' test from Linux
Test Project (LTP). The following bytes were mainly observed: 0x53425355.

When USB storage devices incorrectly skip the data phase with status data,
the code extracts/validates the CSW from the sg buffer, but fails to clear
it afterwards. This leaves status protocol data in srb's transfer buffer,
such as the US_BULK_CS_SIGN 'USBS' signature observed here. Thus, this can
lead to USB protocols leaks to user space through SCSI generic (/dev/sg*)
interfaces, such as the one seen here when the LTP test requested 512 KiB.

Fix the leak by zeroing the CSW data in srb's transfer buffer immediately
after the validation of devices that skip data phase.

Note: Differently from CVE-2018-1000204, which fixed a big leak by zero-
ing pages at allocation time, this leak occurs after allocation, when USB
protocol data is written to already-allocated sg pages.

Fixes: a45b599ad808 ("scsi: sg: allocate with __GFP_ZERO in sg_build_indirect()")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Desnes Nunes <desnesn@...hat.com>
---
V2->V3: Changed memset to use sizeof(buf) and added a comment about the leak
V1->V2: Used the same code style found on usb_stor_Bulk_transport()

 drivers/usb/storage/transport.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c b/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c
index 1aa1bd26c81f..9a4bf86e7b6a 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c
@@ -1200,7 +1200,23 @@ int usb_stor_Bulk_transport(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct us_data *us)
 						US_BULK_CS_WRAP_LEN &&
 					bcs->Signature ==
 						cpu_to_le32(US_BULK_CS_SIGN)) {
+				unsigned char buf[US_BULK_CS_WRAP_LEN];
+
 				usb_stor_dbg(us, "Device skipped data phase\n");
+
+				/*
+				 * Devices skipping data phase might leave CSW data in srb's
+				 * transfer buffer. Zero it to prevent USB protocol leakage.
+				 */
+				sg = NULL;
+				offset = 0;
+				memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+				if (usb_stor_access_xfer_buf(buf,
+						US_BULK_CS_WRAP_LEN, srb, &sg,
+						&offset, TO_XFER_BUF) !=
+							US_BULK_CS_WRAP_LEN)
+					usb_stor_dbg(us, "Failed to clear CSW data\n");
+
 				scsi_set_resid(srb, transfer_length);
 				goto skipped_data_phase;
 			}
-- 
2.51.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ