lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQRPfIqCcMLyf6oX@yjaykim-PowerEdge-T330>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 14:56:12 +0900
From: YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@....com>
To: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
	Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/19] mm, swap: add folio to swap cache directly on
 allocation

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 11:58:41PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>

Hello Kairui 

> The allocator uses SWAP_HAS_CACHE to pin a swap slot upon allocation.
> SWAP_HAS_CACHE is being deprecated as it caused a lot of confusion.
> This pinning usage here can be dropped by adding the folio to swap
> cache directly on allocation.
> 
> All swap allocations are folio-based now (except for hibernation), so
> the swap allocator can always take the folio as the parameter. And now
> both swap cache (swap table) and swap map are protected by the cluster
> lock, scanning the map and inserting the folio can be done in the same
> critical section. This eliminates the time window that a slot is pinned
> by SWAP_HAS_CACHE, but it has no cache, and avoids touching the lock
> multiple times.
> 
> This is both a cleanup and an optimization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/swap.h |   5 --
>  mm/swap.h            |   8 +--
>  mm/swap_state.c      |  56 +++++++++++-------
>  mm/swapfile.c        | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index ac3caa4c6999..4b4b81fbc6a3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> @@ -452,7 +452,6 @@ static inline long get_nr_swap_pages(void)
>  }
>  
>  extern void si_swapinfo(struct sysinfo *);
> -void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry);
>  extern int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t, gfp_t);
>  int swap_type_of(dev_t device, sector_t offset);
>  int find_first_swap(dev_t *device);
> @@ -534,10 +533,6 @@ static inline void swap_put_entries_direct(swp_entry_t ent, int nr)
>  {
>  }
>  
> -static inline void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t swp)
> -{
> -}
> -
>  static inline int __swap_count(swp_entry_t entry)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
> index 74c61129d7b7..03694ffa662f 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.h
> +++ b/mm/swap.h
> @@ -277,13 +277,13 @@ void __swapcache_clear_cached(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>   */
>  struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry);
>  void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry);
> -int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
> -			 void **shadow, bool alloc);
>  void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio);
>  struct folio *swap_cache_alloc_folio(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_flags,
>  				     struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx,
>  				     bool *alloced);
>  /* Below helpers require the caller to lock and pass in the swap cluster. */
> +void __swap_cache_add_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> +			    struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry);
>  void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
>  			    struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow);
>  void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> @@ -459,8 +459,8 @@ static inline void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
> -				       void **shadow, bool alloc)
> +static inline void *__swap_cache_add_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> +		struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
>  {
>  }

Just a nit,
void* return nothing. 

changed to void (original function prototype is return void)
or how about just remove If this is not used on !CONFIG_SWAP

> diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> index d2bcca92b6e0..85d9f99c384f 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,34 @@ void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +void __swap_cache_add_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> +			    struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
> +{
> +	unsigned long new_tb;
> +	unsigned int ci_start, ci_off, ci_end;
> +	unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
> +
> +	new_tb = folio_to_swp_tb(folio);
> +	ci_start = swp_cluster_offset(entry);
> +	ci_off = ci_start;
> +	ci_end = ci_start + nr_pages;
> +	do {
> +		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(swp_tb_is_folio(__swap_table_get(ci, ci_off)));
> +		__swap_table_set(ci, ci_off, new_tb);
> +	} while (++ci_off < ci_end);
> +
> +	folio_ref_add(folio, nr_pages);
> +	folio_set_swapcache(folio);
> +	folio->swap = entry;
> +
> +	node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, nr_pages);
> +	lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, nr_pages);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * swap_cache_add_folio - Add a folio into the swap cache.
>   * @folio: The folio to be added.
> @@ -136,23 +164,18 @@ void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
>   * The caller also needs to update the corresponding swap_map slots with
>   * SWAP_HAS_CACHE bit to avoid race or conflict.
>   */
> -int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
> -			 void **shadowp, bool alloc)
> +static int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
> +				void **shadowp)

It is also a small thing.
"alloc" parameter removed then the comment might be updated.

Thanks,
Youngjun Park

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ