linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable SCSI UFS Crypto and Block Inline encryption drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f9dd9f2-5b4c-4600-a537-d7c8e1ad0f9b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:45:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>,
 bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com, arnd@...db.de,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Enable SCSI UFS Crypto and Block
 Inline encryption drivers

On 31/10/2025 07:24, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 08:48:48PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 30/10/2025 10:55, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> These drivers will allow using the crypto functionalities of the UFS
>>> device, like Inline Crypto Encryption. Both of these drivers are of type
>>> 'bool', so they cannot be built as modules.
>>
>> Is there any device benefiting from these? Which board?
>>
> 
> All ICE capable Qcom UFS based boards.
> 
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
>>
>> You do not need the second tag. You send it via oss.qualcomm.com which
>> is still valid.
>>
> 
> Yes, I know. But I was having some issue in sending email through
> oss.qualcomm.com. Now it got fixed in the RESEND patch, but forgot to remove my
> korg s-o-b.


You do not need second sob when sending through korg. Your previous
identity was still valid. It's used only when old identity is considered
revoked.


Best regards,
Krzysztof