lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ldkrjoan.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:36:32 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Cryolitia PukNgae <cryolitia.pukngae@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,	Jun Zhan
 <zhanjun@...ontech.com>,	聂诚 <niecheng1@...ontech.com>,
	Guan Wentao <guanwentao@...ontech.com>,	Feng Yuan <fengyuan@...ontech.com>,
	kernel <kernel@...ontech.com>,	Cryolitia PukNgae <cryolitia@...ontech.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sound: add uevent notifications for jack events

On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 09:11:56 +0100,
Cryolitia PukNgae wrote:
> 
> I propose adding uevent notifications for all audio jack events in the
> sound subsystem, including headphone and microphone jacks.
> 
> The kernel already sends uevents for certain jack types like HDMI,
> demonstrating this pattern is well-established. However, other common
> audio jacks like headphones and microphones only generate input events,
> not uevents.
> 
> This inconsistency affects userspace tools that rely on uevents for
> device management. Adding uevents for all jack types would provide a
> uniform interface for monitoring audio connection state changes.
> 
> My proposal is straightforward: extend the existing uevent mechanism to
> cover all audio jack plug/unplug events in the sound subsystem. This
> change would maintain backward compatibility with existing input event
> consumers while providing consistent device notification for all jack
> types.
> 
> The change aligns with the semantic purpose of uvents - to notify about
> hardware state changes. Physical connection events naturally fit this
> category.
> 
> If there are objections or historical context I should consider, I would
> appreciate hearing them.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Cryolitia PukNgae

Honestly speaking, I have a mixed feeling for this approach.
I understand that uevents can be used for handling commonly for all
jack events, but OTOH, it means that we may spam a lot there.

FWIW, as generic jack event handling, there is the notification via
ALSA control API for each sound card, not only the input devices,
too.  If any, we may add yet another notifications on top of that with
uevents; but this must not be enabled blindly.


thanks,

Takashi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ