[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19ef0124-9a61-455d-8402-70e840309cf5@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 04:53:37 -0700
From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiumihalcea111@...il.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] reset: imx8mp-audiomix: Switch to using regmap API
On 10/30/2025 6:06 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Mi, 2025-10-29 at 06:52 -0700, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
>> From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
>>
>> As far as the Linux kernel is concerned, block devices such as i.MX8MP's
>> AUDIOMIX block control or i.MX8ULP's SIM LPAV can simultaneously act as
>> clock controllers, reset controllers or mux controllers. Since these IPs
>> offer different functionalities through different subsystem APIs, it's
>> important to make sure that the register R-M-W cycles are performed under
>> the same lock across all subsystem APIs. This will ensure that registers
>> will not end up with the wrong values because of race conditions (e.g.
>> clock consumer tries to update block control register A, while, at the
>> same time, reset consumer tries to update the same block control register).
>>
>> However, the aforementioned race conditions will only impact block control
>> IPs which use the same register for multiple functionalities. For example,
>> i.MX8MP's AUDIOMIX block control IP provides clock gating functionalities
>> and reset control functionalities through different registers. This is why
>> the current approach (i.e. clock control and reset control work using
>> different locks) has worked well so far.
>>
>> Since we want to extend this driver to be usable for i.MX8ULP's SIM LPAV
>> block control IP, we need to make sure that clock control, reset control,
>> and mux control APIs use the same lock since all of these functionalities
>> are performed using the SYSCTRL0 register.
>>
>> To do so, we need to switch to the regmap API and, if possible, use the
>> parent device's regmap, which, in the case of i.MX8ULP, will be the clock
>> controller. This way, we can make sure that the clock gates and the reset
>> controller will use the same lock to perform the register R-M-W cycles.
>>
>> This change will also work fine for cases where we don't really need to
>> share the lock across multiple APIs (e.g. i.MX8MP's AUDIOMIX block
>> control) since regmap will take care of the locking we were previously
>> explicitly performing in the driver.
>>
>> The transition to the regmap API also involves some cleanup. Specifically,
>> we can make use of devres to unmap the device's memory and get rid of the
>> memory mapping-related error paths and the remove() function altogether.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/reset/reset-imx8mp-audiomix.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-imx8mp-audiomix.c b/drivers/reset/reset-imx8mp-audiomix.c
>> index e9643365a62c..3f6d11270918 100644
>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-imx8mp-audiomix.c
>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-imx8mp-audiomix.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>>
>> #define IMX8MP_AUDIOMIX_EARC_RESET_OFFSET 0x200
>> @@ -42,8 +43,8 @@ static const struct imx8mp_reset_map reset_map[] = {
>>
>> struct imx8mp_audiomix_reset {
>> struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
>> - spinlock_t lock; /* protect register read-modify-write cycle */
>> void __iomem *base;
> Drop base as well, better let devres handle this.
>
> [...]
>
>> +/* assumption: registered only if not using parent regmap */
>> +static void imx8mp_audiomix_reset_iounmap(void *data)
> Pass base instead of dev.
ACK. Will need some extra casts/annotations though as sparse will definitely
not be happy with this.
>
>> +{
>> + struct imx8mp_audiomix_reset *priv = dev_get_drvdata(data);
>> +
>> + iounmap(priv->base);
> void __iomem *base = data;
>
> iounmap(base);
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* assumption: dev_set_drvdata() is called before this */
> Why not just pass priv instead of dev?
>
>> +static int imx8mp_audiomix_reset_get_regmap(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct imx8mp_audiomix_reset *priv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + /* try to use the parent's regmap */
>> + priv->regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev->parent, NULL);
>> + if (priv->regmap)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* ... if that's not possible then initialize the regmap right now */
>> + priv->base = of_iomap(dev->parent->of_node, 0);
> Make base a local variable ...
>
>> + if (!priv->base)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "failed to iomap address space\n");
>> +
>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, imx8mp_audiomix_reset_iounmap, dev);
> ... and pass it as data instead of dev.
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register action\n");
>> +
>> + priv->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, priv->base, ®map_config);
>> + if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap))
>> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->regmap),
>> + "failed to initialize regmap\n");
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int imx8mp_audiomix_reset_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
>> const struct auxiliary_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -105,36 +139,26 @@ static int imx8mp_audiomix_reset_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
>> if (!priv)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
>> -
>> priv->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> priv->rcdev.nr_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(reset_map);
>> priv->rcdev.ops = &imx8mp_audiomix_reset_ops;
>> priv->rcdev.of_node = dev->parent->of_node;
>> priv->rcdev.dev = dev;
>> priv->rcdev.of_reset_n_cells = 1;
>> - priv->base = of_iomap(dev->parent->of_node, 0);
>> - if (!priv->base)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + /* keep before call to imx8mp_audiomix_reset_init_regmap() */
> Not needed if priv is passed to it directly.
right, somehow I forgot that rcdev holds a pointer to our "struct device" even though it's right there....
will make the change, thanks!
>
> regards
> Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists