lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251101-bugsieren-gemocht-0e6115014a45@brauner>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 14:10:42 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, 
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, 
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, 
	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: Re: fms extension (Was: [PATCH] fs/pipe: stop duplicating union
 pipe_index declaration)

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 09:34:57PM -0400, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 09:16:02PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:29:18AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > There are several other places in the kernel that blow away
> > > KBUILD_CFLAGS like this that will need the same fix (I went off of
> > > searching for -std=gnu11, as that was needed in many places to fix GCC
> > > 15). It is possible that we might want to take the opportunity to unify
> > > these flags into something like KBUILD_DIALECT_CFLAGS but for now, I
> > > just bothered with adding the flags in the existing places.
> > 
> > That should hopefully do it. Can you update the shared branch with that
> > and then tell me when I can repull?
> 
> I have applied this as commit e066b73bd881 ("kbuild: Add
> '-fms-extensions' to areas with dedicated CFLAGS") in the
> kbuild-ms-extensions branch. I may solicit acks from architecture
> maintainers but I would like to make sure there are no other surprises
> before then.

I'd like a stable branch before -rc5, please.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ