linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Print map ID on successful creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f7078cc-dc32-4d7a-888e-922efcba43b6@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 16:59:47 +0000
From: Quentin Monnet <qmo@...nel.org>
To: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alan.maguire@...cle.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman
 <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Print map ID on successful creation

2025-10-30 14:06 UTC-0700 ~ Harshit Mogalapalli
<harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
> Hi all,
> 
> I have tried looking at an issue from the bpftool repository:
> https://github.com/libbpf/bpftool/issues/121 and this RFC tries to add


This is not longer a RFC :)


> that enhancement.
> 
> Summary: Currently when a map creation is successful there is no message
> on the terminal, printing IDs on successful creation of maps can help
> notify the user and can be used in CI/CD.
> 
> The first patch adds the logic for printing and the second patch adds a
> simple selftest for the same.
> 
> The github issue is not fully solved with these two patches, as there
> are other bpf objects that might need similar additions. Would
> appreciate any inputs on this.


What's your question, exactly?

Thanks,
Quentin