[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dcr6edcm4tjxadd6fjfnolqqver2lg3fxh6mhe4f6lvip3ufy5@5kuc7e566nxi>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 11:57:02 +0100
From: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>
To: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>, 
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>, Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>, 
	David Plowman <david.plowman@...pberrypi.com>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, 
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>, Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>, 
	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] media: i2c: ov5647: Add support for regulator
 control.
Hi Jai
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 12:57:18PM +0530, Jai Luthra wrote:
> From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
>
> The driver supported using GPIOs to control the shutdown line,
> but no regulator control.
>
> Add regulator hooks.
Do bindings need an update ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/ov5647.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5647.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5647.c
> index a33e2d8edc114d302e830639cb7cb161f16a6208..598764638d518a28c8ac61ea590b996f09ecd45c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5647.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5647.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_graph.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/videodev2.h>
>  #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> @@ -83,6 +84,15 @@
>  #define OV5647_EXPOSURE_DEFAULT		1000
>  #define OV5647_EXPOSURE_MAX		65535
>
> +/* regulator supplies */
> +static const char * const ov5647_supply_names[] = {
> +	"avdd",		/* Analog power */
> +	"dovdd",	/* Digital I/O power */
> +	"dvdd",		/* Digital core power */
> +};
> +
> +#define OV5647_NUM_SUPPLIES ARRAY_SIZE(ov5647_supply_names)
> +
>  struct regval_list {
>  	u16 addr;
>  	u8 data;
> @@ -104,6 +114,7 @@ struct ov5647 {
>  	struct mutex			lock;
>  	struct clk			*xclk;
>  	struct gpio_desc		*pwdn;
> +	struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[OV5647_NUM_SUPPLIES];
nit: please align 'supplies' to other members
>  	bool				clock_ncont;
>  	struct v4l2_ctrl_handler	ctrls;
>  	const struct ov5647_mode	*mode;
> @@ -781,6 +792,12 @@ static int ov5647_power_on(struct device *dev)
>
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "OV5647 power on\n");
>
> +	ret = regulator_bulk_enable(OV5647_NUM_SUPPLIES, sensor->supplies);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable regulators\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (sensor->pwdn) {
>  		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(sensor->pwdn, 0);
Should we disable regulators if this fail ?
Also, gpiod_set_value_cansleep() supports optional gpios, so you might
want to remove if (sensor->pwdn), check the return value of this
function and jump to a new label
>  		msleep(PWDN_ACTIVE_DELAY_MS);
> @@ -812,6 +829,7 @@ static int ov5647_power_on(struct device *dev)
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(sensor->xclk);
>  error_pwdn:
>  	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(sensor->pwdn, 1);
> +	regulator_bulk_disable(OV5647_NUM_SUPPLIES, sensor->supplies);
>
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -841,6 +859,7 @@ static int ov5647_power_off(struct device *dev)
>
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(sensor->xclk);
>  	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(sensor->pwdn, 1);
> +	regulator_bulk_disable(OV5647_NUM_SUPPLIES, sensor->supplies);
>
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1341,6 +1360,18 @@ static const struct v4l2_ctrl_ops ov5647_ctrl_ops = {
>  	.s_ctrl = ov5647_s_ctrl,
>  };
>
> +static int ov5647_configure_regulators(struct device *dev,
> +				       struct ov5647 *sensor)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < OV5647_NUM_SUPPLIES; i++)
nit: you can now declared i inside the for loop
Thanks
  j
> +		sensor->supplies[i].supply = ov5647_supply_names[i];
> +
> +	return devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, OV5647_NUM_SUPPLIES,
> +				       sensor->supplies);
> +}
> +
>  static int ov5647_init_controls(struct ov5647 *sensor, struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&sensor->sd);
> @@ -1489,6 +1520,12 @@ static int ov5647_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>
> +	ret = ov5647_configure_regulators(dev, sensor);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get power regulators\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	mutex_init(&sensor->lock);
>
>  	sensor->mode = OV5647_DEFAULT_MODE;
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists