[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251102083622.GB10797@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 09:36:22 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
shuah <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] tools/nolibc: use a custom struct timespec
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 03:46:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025, at 17:02, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> >
> > +struct timespec {
> > + time_t tv_sec;
> > + long tv_nsec;
> > +};
> > +#define _STRUCT_TIMESPEC
> > +
> > +#include <linux/time.h>
>
> Unfortunately this is not the definition we want on big-endian
> systems because it puts the tv_nsec field in the wrong place.
Indeed!
> You can either uses the simple (non-POSIX) __kernel_timespec
> definition in nolibc with a 64-bit tv_nsec, or copy the more
> complicated definition with explicit padding that is used
> in musl and glibc.
I think that switching this patch and the next one (10/12) would
just do the trick since both fields will become __kernel_time64_t.
Or maybe the two should be squashed into a single one.
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists