[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQjOwInKQWIVdjQJ@shikoro>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 16:48:16 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Wojciech Siudy <wojciech.siudy@...ia.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: muxes: pca954x: Fix broken reset-gpio usage
> Maybe I should also add to emphasize:
>
> That offending commit 690de2902dca breaks the ABI which was:
> 1. documented at
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml (line 57)
> 2. implemented in Linux kernel around v3.14.
>
> This ABI breakage was not justified at all, not explained not even
> mentioned in the commit msg, which is a requirement (see writing
> bindings document).
We were under the assumption that the reset-core will provide exactly
the same functionality at a centralized place. It made sense to me, too,
to avoid all the open-coded reset-gpio handlings in various drivers. I
only learnt from Morimoto-san's regression report that things were not
as I thought.
So, I sent out an RFC to discuss how to handle this issue. And if even
Philipp as the maintainer did not point me directly to revert the
offending i2c-mux commit, despite it is "obviously" sooo wrong, then
probably that optional fallback part in the reset-core needs way more
explanations and documentation.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists