[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251103155740.250398-3-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 16:57:38 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian Konig <christian.koenig@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Philip Yang <yangp@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/amdgpu: replace use of system_wq with system_dfl_wq
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
system_wq is the per-cpu workqueue, replaced by system_percpu_wq. This
specific workload does not benefit from a per-cpu workqueue, so use the
new unbound workqueue instead (system_dfl_wq).
The above change introduced in the Workqueue API has been introduced by:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
The old wq (system_wq) will be kept for a few release cycles.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 041ee35684ed..fc61802444b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -4805,7 +4805,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
}
/* must succeed. */
amdgpu_ras_resume(adev);
- queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &adev->delayed_init_work,
+ queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_wq, &adev->delayed_init_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_RESUME_MS));
}
@@ -5335,7 +5335,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_resume(struct drm_device *dev, bool notify_clients)
if (r)
goto exit;
- queue_delayed_work(system_wq, &adev->delayed_init_work,
+ queue_delayed_work(system_dfl_wq, &adev->delayed_init_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_RESUME_MS));
exit:
if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
--
2.51.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists