[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251103171446.GY281971@e132581.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:14:46 +0000
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: arm_spe: Ensure trace is disabled when TRUNCATED
flag is set
On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 02:14:56PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -765,6 +759,15 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_spe_pmu_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * The TRUNCATED flag is set when data loss is detected by PMBSR_EL1.DL,
> > + * or arm_spe_perf_aux_output_begin() sets the flag if runs out of free
> > + * space. Ensure that all perf callbacks have completed for disabling
> > + * the profiling buffer.
> > + */
> > + if (handle->aux_flags & PERF_AUX_FLAG_TRUNCATED)
> > + irq_work_run();
>
> I'm not sure about this. afaict, perf_aux_output_begin() can fail
> (return NULL) without setting the TRUNCATED flag but with a disable
> pending in irq work. It also feels a little fragile moving the existing
> irq_work_run() call as that could easily break in future if e.g. irq
> work is used for other manipulation of the buffer controls.
>
> Given that this isn't a fast path, isn't it simpler and safer just to
> do something like the below?
This is fine for me. However, arm_spe_perf_aux_output_begin() misses to
set the 'hw.state' if arm_spe_pmu_next_off() fails to calculate a valid
limit. We need an extra fix for this (see the pasted code piece).
As a result, we will have two fixes:
1) Fix 'hw.state' setting in arm_spe_perf_aux_output_begin();
2) Invoke irq_work_run() if 'hw.state' is non-zero.
Please let me know if this works for you. Thanks!
Leo
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index fa50645fedda..ff7b1447db0a 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -597,7 +597,6 @@ static void arm_spe_perf_aux_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
/* Start a new aux session */
buf = perf_aux_output_begin(handle, event);
if (!buf) {
- event->hw.state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
/*
* We still need to clear the limit pointer, since the
* profiler might only be disabled by virtue of a fault.
@@ -608,14 +607,18 @@ static void arm_spe_perf_aux_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
limit = buf->snapshot ? arm_spe_pmu_next_snapshot_off(handle)
: arm_spe_pmu_next_off(handle);
- if (limit)
- limit |= PMBLIMITR_EL1_E;
+ if (!limit)
+ goto out_write_limit;
- limit += (u64)buf->base;
+ limit |= (u64)buf->base | PMBLIMITR_EL1_E;
base = (u64)buf->base + PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, buf);
write_sysreg_s(base, SYS_PMBPTR_EL1);
out_write_limit:
+ /* Stop tracing due to an invalid limit pointer */
+ if (!limit)
+ event->hw.state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
write_sysreg_s(limit, SYS_PMBLIMITR_EL1);
}
> Will
>
> --->8
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index fa50645fedda..8a38d69e9600 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -758,6 +758,10 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_spe_pmu_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
> if (!(handle->aux_flags & PERF_AUX_FLAG_TRUNCATED)) {
> arm_spe_perf_aux_output_begin(handle, event);
> isb();
> +
> + /* Insightful comment here */
> + if (event->hw.state)
> + irq_work_run();
> }
> break;
> case SPE_PMU_BUF_FAULT_ACT_SPURIOUS:
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists