[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <334d6272-a1c2-4075-a956-3f41908371a6@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 18:25:41 +0000
From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, "Liam R. Howlett"
<Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/12] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with
in_lazy_mmu_mode()
On 03/11/2025 16:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 29.10.25 11:09, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
>> The generic lazy_mmu layer now tracks whether a task is in lazy MMU
>> mode. As a result we no longer need a TIF flag for that purpose -
>> let's use the new in_lazy_mmu_mode() helper instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 16 +++-------------
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 +--
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 535435248923..61ca88f94551 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -62,30 +62,21 @@ static inline void emit_pte_barriers(void)
>> static inline void queue_pte_barriers(void)
>> {
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> -
>> if (in_interrupt()) {
>> emit_pte_barriers();
>> return;
>> }
>> - flags = read_thread_flags();
>> -
>> - if (flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU)) {
>> - /* Avoid the atomic op if already set. */
>> - if (!(flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING)))
>> - set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);
>> - } else {
>> + if (in_lazy_mmu_mode())
>> + test_and_set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);
>
> You likely don't want a test_and_set here, which would do a
> test_and_set_bit() -- an atomic rmw.
Ah yes good point, the new version would do an atomic RMW in all cases.
Simpler code but also slower :/
>
> You only want to avoid the atomic write if already set.
>
> So keep the current
>
> /* Avoid the atomic op if already set. */
> if (!(flags & BIT(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING)))
> set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);
Pretty much, since we're now only considering one flag we can simplify
it to:
if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING))
set_thread_flag(TIF_LAZY_MMU_PENDING);
- Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists