[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251103215244.2080638-1-xur@google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 21:52:43 +0000
From: xur@...gle.com
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Rong Xu <xur@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@...gle.com>,
Han Shen <shenhan@...gle.com>, Krzysztof Pszeniczny <kpszeniczny@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] objtool: fix the check for dead_end function with
multiple sibliing calls
From: Rong Xu <xur@...gle.com>
If a function has multiple sibling calls, the dead_end check should
only return true if all sibling call targets are also dead_end
functions.
Signed-off-by: Rong Xu <xur@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Han Shen <shenhan@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <kpszeniczny@...gle.com>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 9004fbc067693..c2ee3c3a84a62 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -314,7 +314,13 @@ static bool __dead_end_function(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
return false;
}
- return __dead_end_function(file, insn_func(dest), recursion+1);
+ /*
+ * A function can have multiple sibling calls. All of
+ * them need to be dead ends for the function to be a
+ * dead end too.
+ */
+ if (!__dead_end_function(file, insn_func(dest), recursion+1))
+ return false;
}
}
base-commit: 6146a0f1dfae5d37442a9ddcba012add260bceb0
--
2.51.2.997.g839fc31de9-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists