lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c41cf4eb-cabc-4345-8476-cd7a4d2c4202@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 08:04:00 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
 Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@...il.com>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Vincent Danjean <vdanjean@...ian.org>, 1119093@...s.debian.org
Subject: Re: UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds in ath5k driver

On 03. 11. 25, 8:00, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 01. 11. 25, 15:09, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> In Debian, https://bugs.debian.org/1119093, Vincent Danjean reported
>> the following:
>>>    The ath5k driver seems to do an array-index-out-of-bounds access
>>> as shown by the UBSAN kernel message.
>>> [   17.954484] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [   17.954487] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /build/ 
>>> reproducible-path/linux-6.16.3/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/ 
>>> base.c:1741:20
>>> [   17.955289] index 4 is out of range for type 'ieee80211_tx_rate [4]'
>>> [   17.956134] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1745 Comm: 16 Not tainted 
>>> 6.16.3+deb13-amd64 #1 PREEMPT(lazy)  Debian 6.16.3-1~bpo13+1
>>> [   17.956137] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H67A- 
>>> UD3H-B3/H67A-UD3H-B3, BIOS F8 03/27/2012
>>> [   17.956139] Call Trace:
>>> [   17.956142]  <TASK>
>>> [   17.956145]  dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80
>>> [   17.956154]  ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x2b
>>> [   17.956158]  __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x46/0x4b
>>> [   17.956162]  ath5k_tasklet_tx+0x4e0/0x560 [ath5k]
>>> [   17.956173]  tasklet_action_common+0xb5/0x1c0
>>> [   17.956178]  handle_softirqs+0xdf/0x320
>>> [   17.956181]  __irq_exit_rcu+0xbc/0xe0
>>> [   17.956184]  common_interrupt+0x47/0xa0
>>> [   17.956188]  asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
>>> [   17.956191] RIP: 0033:0x7f4fa439067d
>>> [   17.956204] Code: 0f b6 14 16 45 85 c0 74 01 92 29 d0 c3 48 8d 3c 
>>> 07 48 8d 34 0e 45 85 c0 74 03 48 87 f7 48 0f bc d2 49 29 d3 76 0b 0f 
>>> b6 0c 16 <0f> b6 04 17 29 c8 c3 31 c0 c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 
>>> 0f b6 0e
>>> [   17.956206] RSP: 002b:00007ffd8cc32f08 EFLAGS: 00000212
>>> [   17.956209] RAX: 0000000000000020 RBX: 0000556dfab414a0 RCX: 
>>> 0000000000000070
>>> [   17.956210] RDX: 000000000000000d RSI: 00007f4fa4b7a05f RDI: 
>>> 0000556dfab414a0
>>> [   17.956211] RBP: 00007f4fa4b7a05f R08: 0000000000000400 R09: 
>>> 0000000000000008
>>> [   17.956213] R10: fffffffffffff4b8 R11: 000000000000000e R12: 
>>> 000000000000001b
>>> [   17.956214] R13: 0000556dfab412c0 R14: 00007ffd8cc32f80 R15: 
>>> 00007f4fa4b79eaf
>>> [   17.956217]  </TASK>
>>> [   17.956217] ---[ end trace ]---
>>>
>>> It occurs once at each boot.
>>> According to
>>> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/ 
>>> linux-stable/+blame/master/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
>>> the line of code has not changed for about 15 years.
>>> And I'm using this driver for more than 10 years.
>>> So, the array-index-out-of-bounds does not seem to
>>> have hard consequences for now (by luck?)
>>
>> Does that ring any bell?
> 
> No, but it is real. ts_final_idx is at most 3 on 5212, so:
>    info->status.rates[ts->ts_final_idx + 1].idx = -1;
> with:
>    struct ieee80211_tx_rate rates[IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES];
> and:
>    #define IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES  4
> is indeed bogus.
> 
> IMO we should just *not* set idx = -1 if ts->ts_final_idx is >= 3. As 
> mac80211 won't look at rates beyond IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES.

This™:
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/base.c
@@ -1738,7 +1738,8 @@ ath5k_tx_frame_completed(struct ath5k_hw *ah, 
struct sk_buff *skb,
         }

         info->status.rates[ts->ts_final_idx].count = ts->ts_final_retry;
-       info->status.rates[ts->ts_final_idx + 1].idx = -1;
+       if (ts->ts_final_idx + 1 < IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES)
+               info->status.rates[ts->ts_final_idx + 1].idx = -1;

         if (unlikely(ts->ts_status)) {
                 ah->stats.ack_fail++;

Vincent, can you test this?

> FWIW, the effect of the UB is it just overwrites the next member of 
> info->status, i.e. ack_signal.
> 
> thanks,

-- 
js
suse labs


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ