[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<CAGwozwHCnHwOVw08ZJ4LOFD8kDv+kevvF1-PkjBq2+VMBBx9TQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 08:36:36 +0100
From: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@...heas.dev>
To: "Derek J. Clark" <derekjohn.clark@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
"Luke D . Jones" <luke@...nes.dev>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Denis Benato <benato.denis96@...il.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Add support for multiple
kbd led handlers
On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 at 05:29, Derek J. Clark <derekjohn.clark@...il.com> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 09:27, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
> >>
> >> > > 1589
> >> > > 1590 static void kbd_led_update_all(struct work_struct *work)
> >> > > 1591 {
> >> > > 1592 enum led_brightness value;
> >> > > 1593 struct asus_wmi *asus;
> >> > > 1594 bool registered, notify;
> >> > > 1595 int ret;
> >> > /\ value should have been an int and
> >> > placed here. It can take the value -1 hence the check
> >>
> >> Thanks, that needs to be fixed before the final merge.
> >>
> >> > Are there any other comments on the series?
> >> >
> >> > The only issue I am aware of is that Denis identified a bug in asusd
> >> > (asusctl userspace program daemon) in certain Asus G14/G16 laptops
> >> > that cause laptop keys to become sticky, I have had users also report
> >> > that bug in previous versions of the series. WIthout asusd running,
> >> > keyboards work fine incl. with brightness control (did not work
> >> > before). Given it will take two months for this to reach mainline, I
> >> > think it is a fair amount of time to address the bug.
> >>
> >> One thing that is not clear to me about this -- is this causing a visible
> >> user-space behavior regression before vs. after the patchset with asusctl?
> >>
> >> If so, I am afraid this needs to be root-caused and fixed before the set
> >> can be considered for inclusion.
>
> >Commit 591ba2074337 ("HID: asus: prevent binding to all HID devices on
> >ROG") adds HID_QUIRK_INPUT_PER_APP and the extra devices seem to
> >confuse asusd. Since the devices are the same as with hid-asus not
> >loaded, it is specific to that program.
> >
> >
> Hi Antheas.
>
> While you have previously expressed to me directly that you wish InputPlumber
> didn't exist, it still very much does, in fact, exist. I also know that you are
> explicitly aware that InputPlumber is a consumer of this interface, so your
> comment that asusctl is the only affected program is something you know to be
> false. This is not even the first time you have renamed an input device that
> you knew InputPlumber was a consumer of without notifying me[1].
>
> I can't abide you outright lying to the maintainers here and I'm sick and tired
> of having to watch your every move on the LKML. Either become a good citizen of
> kernel maintenance, or get out of it.
Hi Derek,
I am not aware if your software is affected or not by this series as I
have not received reports about it.
If it is, please add:
"ASUSTeK Computer Inc. N-KEY Device"
As a name match to your software (should only take 5 minutes).
I worked with Luke and Dennis on it for the better part of a year so
hopefully they forwarded to you if it affects you or not.
Your software relies on OOT drivers for most devices incl. the Ally so
I am unsure if it is affected in reality. E.g., it would not be
affected in SteamOS and CachyOS. In the future, it would be good to
avoid name matches for your software as it makes it very fragile,
which is a discussion we have had before. I do not think device evdev
names constitute an ABI technically.
Best,
Antheas
> Commit 591ba2074337 ("HID: asus: prevent binding to all HID devices on ROG")
> Nacked-By: Derek J. Clark <derekjohn.clark@...il.com>
>
> - Derek
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/Z74vZD7ZtKBTDlwy@google.com/
>
> >We can delay that patch until Denis who took over maintenance of the
> >program can have a deeper look. I will still keep the last part of
> >that patch that skips the input check, because that causes errors in
> >devices that do not create an input device (e.g., lightbar).
> >
> >Antheas
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists