linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4faab8bee2b4430447ff7aeac0f2b3e9aac8ec8@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 11:26:01 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Simona Vetter
 <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, Intel Graphics
 <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann
 <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree

On Mon, 03 Nov 2025, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_drv.c: In function 'rzg2l_du_probe':
> drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_drv.c:173:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_info'; did you mean 'pr_info'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   173 |         drm_info(&rcdu->ddev, "Device %s probed\n", dev_name(&pdev->dev));
>       |         ^~~~~~~~
>       |         pr_info
>
> Presumably caused by commit
>
>   9695c143b72a ("drm/buddy: replace drm_print.h include with a forward declaration")
> or
>   ea722522d505 ("drm/mm: replace drm_print.h include with a forward declaration")
> or
>   d7a849d126d0 ("drm/ttm: replace drm_print.h include with a forward declaration")
>
> I have applied the following fix patch for today:

Thanks for the report, the fix (same as yours) is at [1].

BR,
Jani.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/04f617d5fe37f92d750efbb73065df3997f5c6b5.1762161597.git.jani.nikula@intel.com


>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:12:27 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for dropping drm_print.h includes
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_drv.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_drv.c
> index e1aa6a719529..c34b1a13e685 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_drv.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_fbdev_dma.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_gem_dma_helper.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_print.h>
>  
>  #include "rzg2l_du_drv.h"
>  #include "rzg2l_du_kms.h"
> -- 
> 2.51.1
>
> Which lead to this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c: In function 'vop2_convert_format':
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:215:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'DRM_ERROR'; did you mean 'SO_ERROR'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   215 |                 DRM_ERROR("unsupported format[%08x]\n", format);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~
>       |                 SO_ERROR
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c: In function 'rockchip_vop2_mod_supported':
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:395:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_dbg_kms' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   395 |                                 drm_dbg_kms(vop2->drm,
>       |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c: In function 'vop2_setup_scale':
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:602:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_dbg'; did you mean 'dev_dbg'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   602 |                         drm_dbg(vop2->drm, "%s dst_w[%d] should align as 2 pixel\n",
>       |                         ^~~~~~~
>       |                         dev_dbg
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c: In function 'vop2_core_clks_prepare_enable':
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:763:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_err'; did you mean 'pr_err'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   763 |                 drm_err(vop2->drm, "failed to enable hclk - %d\n", ret);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~
>       |                 pr_err
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c: In function 'vop2_crtc_atomic_disable':
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:967:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_info'; did you mean 'pr_info'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   967 |                 drm_info(vop2->drm, "wait for vp%d dsp_hold timeout\n", vp->id);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~
>       |                 pr_info
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c: In function 'vop2_crtc_atomic_enable':
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:1758:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_warn'; did you mean 'dev_warn'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>  1758 |                                         drm_warn(vop2->drm,
>       |                                         ^~~~~~~~
>       |                                         dev_warn
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c: In function 'rk3576_vp_isr':
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop2.c:2198:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_err_ratelimited'; did you mean 'pr_err_ratelimited'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>  2198 |                 drm_err_ratelimited(vop2->drm, "POST_BUF_EMPTY irq err at vp%d\n", vp->id);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                 pr_err_ratelimited
>
> So, I have instead used the drm-misc tree from next-20251031 for today.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel