linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAofZF6EE=grXh8mowNRDcDkL8RwwrvGhawcjGqcEhn5M4M6zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:31:31 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, 
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, 
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, 
	Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq

Hi Krzysztof,

On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 11:19 AM Krzysztof Karas
<krzysztof.karas@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marco,
> [...]
> This commit message is very similar to your previous change:
> 128ea9f6ccfb6960293ae4212f4f97165e42222d - did you do that
> intentionally or is this a copy-paste mistake? This is also
> prevalent in other two patches, so I am curious.

Yes it is intentional. Well, the idea was to give a bit of the context
about the rename of the workqueues, sharing more details in the
cover letter (where is present also the commit hash you shared).

Sorry if this created confusion.

> >
> > Adding system_dfl_wq to encourage its use when unbound work should be used.
> Please remove this sentence, because this has already been done.
>

Sure, that was not intentional (copy and paste mistake).

Thank you!

-- 

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product