linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] software node: allow referencing firmware nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQiJgRDm0lZYqSmj@kekkonen.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 12:52:49 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] software node: allow referencing firmware nodes

Hi Bartosz, Andy,

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 11:36:36AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 10:49 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > +#define SOFTWARE_NODE_REF_SWNODE(_ref, ...)                  \
> > > +     __SOFTWARE_NODE_REF(_ref, __VA_ARGS__)
> > > +
> > > +#define SOFTWARE_NODE_REF_FWNODE(_ref, ...)                  \
> > > +     __SOFTWARE_NODE_REF(_ref, __VA_ARGS__)
> > > +
> > > +/* DEPRECATED, use SOFTWARE_NODE_REF_SWNODE() instead. */
> > > +#define SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(_ref, ...)                   \
> > > +     SOFTWARE_NODE_REF_SWNODE(_ref, __VA_ARGS__)
> >
> > Now, useless.
> >
> 
> No, why? With these changes, SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE()'s name is a bit
> misleading or incomplete, so I'm proposing to start replacing it with
> SOFTWARE_NODE_REF_SWNODE() which is compatible with the former but has
> a better name.

Given we're already using _Generic() to determine the argument type, could
we simply use e.g. SOFTWARE_NODE_REF() in both cases?

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus