[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176217662645.4491.9524914948435472872.b4-ty@imgtec.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:30:26 +0000
From: Matt Coster <matt.coster@...tec.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard
<mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Michal Wilczynski
<m.wilczynski@...sung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Matt Coster
<matt.coster@...tec.com>
CC: Frank Binns <frank.binns@...tec.com>,
Alessio Belle
<alessio.belle@...tec.com>,
Alexandru Dadu <alexandru.dadu@...tec.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/imagination: Optionally depend on POWER_SEQUENCING
On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 12:57:31 +0100, Matt Coster wrote:
> When the change using pwrseq was added, I nixed the dependency on
> POWER_SEQUENCING since we didn't want it pulled in on platforms where
> it's not needed [1]. I hadn't, however, considered the link-time
> implications of this for configs with POWER_SEQUENCING=m.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a265a20e-8908-40d8-b4e0-2c8b8f773742@imgtec.com/
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] drm/imagination: Optionally depend on POWER_SEQUENCING
(no commit info)
Best regards,
--
Matt Coster <matt.coster@...tec.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists