linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rust: kernel: Support more jump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=WZJ5=UACpFLWCVJ7mcXbc93X9MyYAZP8-0F==2b0adw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 15:14:09 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: chenmiao <chenmiao@...natom.club>
Cc: ojeda@...nel.org, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>, 
	"open list:RUST" <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: kernel: Support more jump_label api

Hi chenmiao,

A few procedural bits below for future versions/patches...

On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 3:04 AM chenmiao <chenmiao@...natom.club> wrote:
>
> If finding the offset from the primitive type is necessary for this
> implementation, I will abandon this change.

In general, this should not be part of the commit message, but go
below the `---` line.

And if the commit is not ready, typically it should be marked as RFC.

> Additionally, support for the `static_branch_enable/disable` APIs has been
> introduced.

Please split different changes in different patches if possible.

> Signed-off-by: chenmiao <chenmiao@...natom.club>

In another email you used Chen Miao in the From -- in general, please
note that the SoB is supposed to have the "full name" ("known
identity") as you would normally write it. I mention this since
sometimes people use the local part of the email address, i.e. `...@`,
but that is usually not the normal spelling of a full name. Of course,
please ignore this if it is correct already.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel