[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <930c474f-f242-4773-8b17-c1092650b092@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:13:46 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/20] drm/amdgpu: introduce amdgpu_ttm_entity
On 11/4/25 09:35, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
> No functional change for now, but this struct will have more
> fields added in the next commit.
>
> Technically the change introduces synchronisation issue, because
> dependencies between successive jobs are not taken care of
> properly. For instance, amdgpu_ttm_clear_buffer uses
> amdgpu_ttm_map_buffer then amdgpu_ttm_fill_mem which use
> different entities (default_entity then move/clear entity).
> But it's all working as expected, because all entities use the
> same sdma instance for now and default_entity has a higher prio
> so its job always gets scheduler first.
>
> The next commits will deal with these dependencies correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@....com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 12 ++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c | 13 ++++++----
> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
> index 9dcf51991b5b..8e2d41c9c271 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gmc.c
> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ void amdgpu_gmc_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
> * itself at least for GART.
> */
> mutex_lock(&adev->mman.gtt_window_lock);
> - r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(ring->adev, &adev->mman.high_pr,
> + r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(ring->adev, &adev->mman.default_entity.base,
> AMDGPU_FENCE_OWNER_UNDEFINED,
> 16 * 4, AMDGPU_IB_POOL_IMMEDIATE,
> &job, AMDGPU_KERNEL_JOB_ID_FLUSH_GPU_TLB);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> index fce22712396b..94e909905c64 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_map_buffer(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> num_dw = ALIGN(adev->mman.buffer_funcs->copy_num_dw, 8);
> num_bytes = num_pages * 8 * AMDGPU_GPU_PAGES_IN_CPU_PAGE;
>
> - r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(adev, &adev->mman.high_pr,
> + r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(adev, &adev->mman.default_entity.base,
> AMDGPU_FENCE_OWNER_UNDEFINED,
> num_dw * 4 + num_bytes,
> AMDGPU_IB_POOL_DELAYED, &job,
> @@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_access_memory_sdma(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> memcpy(adev->mman.sdma_access_ptr, buf, len);
>
> num_dw = ALIGN(adev->mman.buffer_funcs->copy_num_dw, 8);
> - r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(adev, &adev->mman.high_pr,
> + r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(adev, &adev->mman.default_entity.base,
> AMDGPU_FENCE_OWNER_UNDEFINED,
> num_dw * 4, AMDGPU_IB_POOL_DELAYED,
> &job,
> @@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@ void amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
>
> ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
> sched = &ring->sched;
> - r = drm_sched_entity_init(&adev->mman.high_pr,
> + r = drm_sched_entity_init(&adev->mman.default_entity.base,
> DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL, &sched,
> 1, NULL);
> if (r) {
> @@ -2178,18 +2178,30 @@ void amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
> return;
> }
>
> - r = drm_sched_entity_init(&adev->mman.low_pr,
> + r = drm_sched_entity_init(&adev->mman.clear_entity.base,
> + DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_NORMAL, &sched,
> + 1, NULL);
> + if (r) {
> + dev_err(adev->dev,
> + "Failed setting up TTM BO clear entity (%d)\n",
> + r);
> + goto error_free_entity;
> + }
> +
> + r = drm_sched_entity_init(&adev->mman.move_entity.base,
> DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_NORMAL, &sched,
> 1, NULL);
> if (r) {
> dev_err(adev->dev,
> "Failed setting up TTM BO move entity (%d)\n",
> r);
> + drm_sched_entity_destroy(&adev->mman.clear_entity.base);
> goto error_free_entity;
> }
> } else {
> - drm_sched_entity_destroy(&adev->mman.high_pr);
> - drm_sched_entity_destroy(&adev->mman.low_pr);
> + drm_sched_entity_destroy(&adev->mman.default_entity.base);
> + drm_sched_entity_destroy(&adev->mman.clear_entity.base);
> + drm_sched_entity_destroy(&adev->mman.move_entity.base);
> for (i = 0; i < TTM_FENCES_MAX_SLOT_COUNT; i++) {
> dma_fence_put(man->pipelined_eviction.fences[i]);
> man->pipelined_eviction.fences[i] = NULL;
> @@ -2207,7 +2219,7 @@ void amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
> return;
>
> error_free_entity:
> - drm_sched_entity_destroy(&adev->mman.high_pr);
> + drm_sched_entity_destroy(&adev->mman.default_entity.base);
> }
>
> static int amdgpu_ttm_prepare_job(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> @@ -2219,8 +2231,8 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_prepare_job(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> {
> enum amdgpu_ib_pool_type pool = AMDGPU_IB_POOL_DELAYED;
> int r;
> - struct drm_sched_entity *entity = delayed ? &adev->mman.low_pr :
> - &adev->mman.high_pr;
> + struct drm_sched_entity *entity = delayed ? &adev->mman.clear_entity.base :
> + &adev->mman.move_entity.base;
> r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(adev, entity,
> AMDGPU_FENCE_OWNER_UNDEFINED,
> num_dw * 4, pool, job, k_job_id);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
> index 50e40380fe95..f83313bc0afb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ struct amdgpu_gtt_mgr {
> spinlock_t lock;
> };
>
> +struct amdgpu_ttm_entity {
Mhm, I think this needs a better name.
Maybe amdgpu_ttm_buffer_entity or something like that.
Apart from that looks good to me.
Christian.
> + struct drm_sched_entity base;
> +};
> +
> struct amdgpu_mman {
> struct ttm_device bdev;
> struct ttm_pool *ttm_pools;
> @@ -64,10 +68,10 @@ struct amdgpu_mman {
> bool buffer_funcs_enabled;
>
> struct mutex gtt_window_lock;
> - /* High priority scheduler entity for buffer moves */
> - struct drm_sched_entity high_pr;
> - /* Low priority scheduler entity for VRAM clearing */
> - struct drm_sched_entity low_pr;
> +
> + struct amdgpu_ttm_entity default_entity;
> + struct amdgpu_ttm_entity clear_entity;
> + struct amdgpu_ttm_entity move_entity;
>
> struct amdgpu_vram_mgr vram_mgr;
> struct amdgpu_gtt_mgr gtt_mgr;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> index 378af0b2aaa9..1d35a89999f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ svm_migrate_direct_mapping_addr(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u64 addr)
> }
>
> static int
> -svm_migrate_gart_map(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, u64 npages,
> +svm_migrate_gart_map(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> + struct amdgpu_ttm_entity *entity,
> + u64 npages,
> dma_addr_t *addr, u64 *gart_addr, u64 flags)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> @@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ svm_migrate_gart_map(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, u64 npages,
> num_dw = ALIGN(adev->mman.buffer_funcs->copy_num_dw, 8);
> num_bytes = npages * 8;
>
> - r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(adev, &adev->mman.high_pr,
> + r = amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(adev, &entity->base,
> AMDGPU_FENCE_OWNER_UNDEFINED,
> num_dw * 4 + num_bytes,
> AMDGPU_IB_POOL_DELAYED,
> @@ -128,11 +130,14 @@ svm_migrate_copy_memory_gart(struct amdgpu_device *adev, dma_addr_t *sys,
> {
> const u64 GTT_MAX_PAGES = AMDGPU_GTT_MAX_TRANSFER_SIZE;
> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
> + struct amdgpu_ttm_entity *entity;
> u64 gart_s, gart_d;
> struct dma_fence *next;
> u64 size;
> int r;
>
> + entity = &adev->mman.move_entity;
> +
> mutex_lock(&adev->mman.gtt_window_lock);
>
> while (npages) {
> @@ -140,10 +145,10 @@ svm_migrate_copy_memory_gart(struct amdgpu_device *adev, dma_addr_t *sys,
>
> if (direction == FROM_VRAM_TO_RAM) {
> gart_s = svm_migrate_direct_mapping_addr(adev, *vram);
> - r = svm_migrate_gart_map(ring, size, sys, &gart_d, 0);
> + r = svm_migrate_gart_map(ring, entity, size, sys, &gart_d, 0);
>
> } else if (direction == FROM_RAM_TO_VRAM) {
> - r = svm_migrate_gart_map(ring, size, sys, &gart_s,
> + r = svm_migrate_gart_map(ring, entity, size, sys, &gart_s,
> KFD_IOCTL_SVM_FLAG_GPU_RO);
> gart_d = svm_migrate_direct_mapping_addr(adev, *vram);
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists