[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251104042334.GA11714@nxa18884-linux.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:24:12 +0800
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Use
start/stop/detect_mode ops from imx_rproc_dcfg
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 03:04:39PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 05:08:35PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Allow each platform to provide its own implementation of start/stop/
>> detect_mode operations, and prepare to eliminate the need for multiple
>> switch-case statements.
>>
>> Improve code readability and maintainability by encapsulating
>> platform-specific behavior.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
>> index 1726aaa1eafb9ac1a913e3e2caea73801b86dc09..833b1bd4019614157f0bedf09bd348caab802eef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
>> @@ -404,6 +404,11 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
>> int ret;
>>
>> + if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->start) {
>> + ret = dcfg->ops->start(rproc);
>> + goto start_ret;
>
>not sure if error message is important, maybe
I would like to keep the error message. Since this patch is just to prepare
for ops introducton, I would not change the original behavior.
Thanks,
Peng
>
> return dcfg->ops->start(rproc);
>
>Frank
>> + }
>> +
>> switch (dcfg->method) {
>> case IMX_RPROC_MMIO:
>> ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap,
>> @@ -424,6 +429,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> +start_ret:
>> if (ret)
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable remote core!\n");
>> else if (priv->flags & WAIT_FW_READY)
>> @@ -449,6 +455,11 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> + if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->stop) {
>> + ret = dcfg->ops->stop(rproc);
>> + goto stop_ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> switch (dcfg->method) {
>> case IMX_RPROC_MMIO:
>> ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->src_reg, dcfg->src_mask,
>> @@ -467,6 +478,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> +stop_ret:
>> if (ret)
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to stop remote core\n");
>> else
>> @@ -1085,10 +1097,14 @@ static int imx_dsp_attach_pm_domains(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
>> static int imx_dsp_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
>> {
>> const struct imx_dsp_rproc_dcfg *dsp_dcfg = priv->dsp_dcfg;
>> + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = dsp_dcfg->dcfg;
>> struct device *dev = priv->rproc->dev.parent;
>> struct regmap *regmap;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> + if (dcfg->ops && dcfg->ops->detect_mode)
>> + return dcfg->ops->detect_mode(priv->rproc);
>> +
>> switch (dsp_dcfg->dcfg->method) {
>> case IMX_RPROC_SCU_API:
>> ret = imx_scu_get_handle(&priv->ipc_handle);
>>
>> --
>> 2.37.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists