[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251104093406.9135-1-gouhao@uniontech.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 17:34:06 +0800
From: Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>
To: cem@...nel.org,
corbet@....net
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gouhaojake@....com,
guanwentao@...ontech.com
Subject: [PATCH] xfs-doc: Fix typo error
online fsck may take longer than offline fsck...
Signed-off-by: Gou Hao <gouhao@...ontech.com>
---
Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
index 8cbcd3c26434..55e727b5f12e 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ sharing and lock acquisition rules as the regular filesystem.
This means that scrub cannot take *any* shortcuts to save time, because doing
so could lead to concurrency problems.
In other words, online fsck is not a complete replacement for offline fsck, and
-a complete run of online fsck may take longer than online fsck.
+a complete run of online fsck may take longer than offline fsck.
However, both of these limitations are acceptable tradeoffs to satisfy the
different motivations of online fsck, which are to **minimize system downtime**
and to **increase predictability of operation**.
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists