[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251104-bipedal-sheep-of-advertising-08450c@kuoka>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 10:48:22 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Khairul Anuar Romli <khairul.anuar.romli@...era.com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Mahesh Rao <mahesh.rao@...era.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Ng Ho Yin <adrianhoyin.ng@...era.com>, Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumarlaxmidas.rabara@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: svc: Add IOMMU support for
Agilex5
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 07:39:27AM +0800, Khairul Anuar Romli wrote:
> In Agilex5, the TBU (Translation Buffer Unit) can now operate in non-secure
> mode, enabling Linux to utilize it through the IOMMU framework. This allows
> improved memory management capabilities in non-secure environments. With
> Agilex5 lifting this restriction, we are now extending the device tree
> bindings to support IOMMU for the Agilex5 SVC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khairul Anuar Romli <khairul.anuar.romli@...era.com>
> Reviewed-by: Adrian Ng Ho Yin <adrianhoyin.ng@...era.com>
> Reviewed-by: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumarlaxmidas.rabara@...era.com>
Two reviews but...
>
> -required:
> - - compatible
> - - method
> - - memory-region
> +allOf:
> + - required:
> + - compatible
> + - method
> + - memory-region
... none told you this is not the correct syntax / style?
Were these reviews really happening? What exactly was reviewed here?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists