[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQndAnoFClKOSer2@e129823.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 11:01:22 +0000
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>
To: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev, miko.lenczewski@....com,
kevin.brodsky@....com, ardb@...nel.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
scott@...amperecomputing.com, joey.gouly@....com,
yuzenghui@...wei.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 9/9] arm64: armv8_deprecated: apply FEAT_LSUI for
swpX emulation.
[...]
> +static __always_inline int
> +__lsui_user_swpb_asm(unsigned int *data, unsigned int addr)
> +{
> + unsigned char idx;
> + int err;
> + unsigned int addr_al;
> + union {
> + unsigned int var;
> + unsigned char raw[4];
> + } data_al;
> +
> + idx = addr & (sizeof(unsigned int) - 1);
> + addr_al = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, sizeof(unsigned int));
> +
> + if (get_user(data_al.var, (unsigned int *)(unsigned long)addr_al))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + data_al.raw[idx] = *data;
> +
> + err = __lsui_user_swp_asm(&data_al.var, addr_al);
I found that using swpt for swpb can cause a race condition
when each CPU accesses its own dedicated byte memory region in 4 bytes.
So, unless there are any comments,
I’ll rework it with a cast in the next version.
> + if (!err)
> + *data = data_al.raw[idx];
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_AS_HAS_LSUI */
Thanks.
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists