linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] fpga: Add dummy definitions of API functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQqsnFl8uakMAsH+@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:47:08 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
Cc: linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] fpga: Add dummy definitions of API functions

On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 03:27:01PM +0000, Ian Abbott wrote:
> Add dummy definitions of the FPGA API functions for build testing
> 
> 1) fpga: altera-pr-ip: Add dummy definitions of API functions
> 2) fpga: bridge: Add dummy definitions of API functions
> 3) fpga: manager: Add dummy definitions of API functions
> 4) fpga: region: Add dummy definitions of API functions

Sorry I don't get the idea. Why should someone use FPGA APIs without
selecting CONIG_FPGA_XXX? Better make the changes along with the use
case patches.

Thanks,
Yilun

> 
>  include/linux/fpga/altera-pr-ip-core.h |  8 ++-
>  include/linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h       | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h          | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/fpga/fpga-region.h       | 44 ++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>