[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQtoNxBstUI-c6qp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 17:07:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
andy@...nel.org, error27@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: trigger: Fix error handling in viio_trigger_alloc
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 05:04:32PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 05:47:14PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> > viio_trigger_alloc() initializes the device with device_initialize()
> > but uses kfree() directly in error paths, which bypasses the device's
> > release callback iio_trig_release(). This could lead to memory leaks
> > and inconsistent device state.
> >
> > Replace kfree(trig) with put_device(&trig->dev) in error paths to
> > ensure proper cleanup through the device's release callback.
>
> Now when irq_alloc_descs() fails, trig->subirq_base becomes negative and
> in the release callback it will pass the
>
> if (trig->subirq_base) {
>
> Is it a problem?
>
> The release function also misses mutex_destroy().
Ah, and if kvasprintf() fails, the error path will call irq_free_descs() and
then one more time in the release callback.
You finding is good, but the fix needs to be crafted thoughtfully.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists