[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251105155742.293326-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:57:34 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq
Hi,
=== Current situation: problems ===
Let's consider a nohz_full system with isolated CPUs: wq_unbound_cpumask is
set to the housekeeping CPUs, for !WQ_UNBOUND the local CPU is selected.
This leads to different scenarios if a work item is scheduled on an
isolated CPU where "delay" value is 0 or greater then 0:
schedule_delayed_work(, 0);
This will be handled by __queue_work() that will queue the work item on the
current local (isolated) CPU, while:
schedule_delayed_work(, 1);
Will move the timer on an housekeeping CPU, and schedule the work there.
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
=== Recent changes to the WQ API ===
The following, address the recent changes in the Workqueue API:
- commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
- commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
The old workqueues will be removed in a future release cycle.
=== Introduced Changes by this series ===
1) [P 1-2] Replace uses of system_wq and system_unbound_wq
system_wq is a per-CPU workqueue, but his name is not clear.
Because of that, system_wq has been replaced with system_percpu_wq,
keeping the old behavior.
Thanks!
Marco Crivellari (2):
platform: surface: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
platform: x86: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c | 2 +-
drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_request_layer.c | 2 +-
drivers/platform/x86/gpd-pocket-fan.c | 4 ++--
drivers/platform/x86/x86-android-tablets/vexia_atla10_ec.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.51.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists