[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0be97b27-4f8b-4d22-a653-154e87ecbc78@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:43:58 +0100
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nel.org>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Steam Lin <STLin2@...bond.com>, Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/28] spi: spi-mem: Create a repeated address operation
On 10/31/25 6:26 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> In octal DTR mode, while the command opcode is *always* repeated,
this info is wrong: opcode can be repeated, inverted or a dedicated 16bit,
so please fix this to not mislead readers
> addresses may either be long enough to cover at least two bytes (in
> which case the existing macro works), or otherwise for single byte
> addresses, the byte must also be duplicated and sent twice: on each
> front of the clock. Create a macro for this common case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> ---
> include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h b/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> index 81c9c7e793b6ab894675e0198d412d84b8525c2e..e4db0924898ce5b17d2b6d4269495bb968db2871 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,14 @@
> .dtr = true, \
> }
>
> +#define SPI_MEM_DTR_OP_RPT_ADDR(__val, __buswidth) \
I find the name too generic. This is an macro for 1 byte addresses, right?
> + { \
> + .nbytes = 2, \
> + .val = __val | __val << 8, \
> + .buswidth = __buswidth, \
> + .dtr = true, \
> + }
> +
> #define SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR { }
>
> #define SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(__nbytes, __buswidth) \
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists