[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5680a2a8-aeb3-4274-a264-4ff658cc9246@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 17:28:29 +0100
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nel.org>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Steam Lin <STLin2@...bond.com>, Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/28] mtd: spinand: Make use of the operation templates
through SPINAND_OP()
On 10/31/25 6:26 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> index 4afebaf5f0195b9bc617ea1f125f637f76fff9f8..a8fd04a67cfa9925bd68c57539d86e0816b76274 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> @@ -701,6 +701,93 @@ struct spinand_device {
> unsigned int retry_mode);
> };
>
> +static inline struct spi_mem_op
Do we still do inlines?
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists