[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251105162932.GAaQt7bON4FtSmxQ3Z@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 17:29:32 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAS/CEC: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 05:08:19PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
> used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
Please write out "wq" - the commit message should be for humans and not
contain variables or entities from the code.
> WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
s/cpu/CPU/
> schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
> again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
>
> This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
>
> This patch continues the effort to refactor worqueue APIs, which has begun
Avoid having "This patch" or "This commit" in the commit message. It is
tautologically useless.
Also, do
$ git grep 'This patch' Documentation/process
for more details.
> with the change introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
>
> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>
> Replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq, keeping the old behavior.
What is the new behavior?
Should this driver be converted to it?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists