[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQt41uGfmbs7Qa7x@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:18:30 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Prajna Rajendra Kumar <prajna.rajendrakumar@...rochip.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Valentina Fernandez Alanis <valentina.fernandezalanis@...rochip.com>,
Cyril Jean <cyril.jean@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] spi: add support for microchip "soft" spi
controller
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 03:28:23PM +0000, Prajna Rajendra Kumar wrote:
> drivers/spi/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 442 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 452 insertions(+)
> +config SPI_MICROCHIP_CORE
> + tristate "Microchip FPGA SPI controllers"
> + depends on SPI_MASTER
Reusing the same filename and config symbol is almost certainly going to
create issues and confusion for people upgrading their kernel or doing
backports. Perhaps CoreSPI instead?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists