[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99c95bb6-6595-4b68-afa7-1614f619a20f@suswa.mountain>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 19:48:19 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev, Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@...asonboard.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
lkp@...el.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-list@...pberrypi.com,
Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
Umang Jain <uajain@...lia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] platform/raspberrypi: Destage VCHIQ interface
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 03:17:01PM +0000, Phil Elwell wrote:
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 583 static long
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 584 vchiq_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 585 {
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 586 struct vchiq_instance *instance = file->private_data;
> > 3414994ba84042 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Umang Jain 2022-12-23 587 int status = 0;
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 588 struct vchiq_service *service = NULL;
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 589 long ret = 0;
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 590 int i, rc;
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 591
> > 96622d58f50b8f drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Thomas Weißschuh 2025-03-11 592 dev_dbg(instance->state->dev, "arm: instance %p, cmd %s, arg %lx\n", instance,
> > 8757f705d936ad drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Gaston Gonzalez 2021-09-12 593 ((_IOC_TYPE(cmd) == VCHIQ_IOC_MAGIC) && (_IOC_NR(cmd) <= VCHIQ_IOC_MAX)) ?
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 594 ioctl_names[_IOC_NR(cmd)] : "<invalid>", arg);
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 595
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 596 switch (cmd) {
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 597 case VCHIQ_IOC_SHUTDOWN:
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 598 if (!instance->connected)
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 599 break;
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 600
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 601 /* Remove all services */
> > f05916281fd75d drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-21 @602 i = 0;
> >
> > i is not used any more. Delete.
>
> No, don't do that. It's passed as an in/out parameter to
> next_service_by_instance - it maintains the iterator position. This is
> a false positive.
>
Uh... Crud. You're right.
I knew this check was generating false positives but I try to filter it
manually. Which is lazy. I will fix this false positive.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists