linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/12] selftests/vsock: add 1.37 to tested virtme-ng versions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQukUFyuN+iJ1zv9@devvm11784.nha0.facebook.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 11:24:00 -0800
From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 10/12] selftests/vsock: add 1.37 to tested
 virtme-ng versions

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 03:48:09PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 02:39:00PM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
> > 
> > Testing with 1.37 shows all tests passing but emits the warning:
> > 
> > warning: vng version 'virtme-ng 1.37' has not been tested and may not function properly.
> > 	The following versions have been tested: 1.33 1.36
> > 
> > This patch adds 1.37 to the virtme-ng versions to get rid of the above
> > warning.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> 
> I'm just worried that the list will explode. Perhaps in the future we should
> just define the minimum version that we are sure we can support and the
> maximum that we have tested.
> 
> Stefano
> 

Sounds like a good approach.

Best,
Bobby