lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8f4e753-836d-4ca4-8a94-c54738b7db45@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:56:34 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
 Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
 Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
 Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache
 <npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
 Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
 Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
 Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>, Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>,
 Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>, Ying Huang
 <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
 Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>, Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>,
 Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
 Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
 Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
 Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Xu Xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>,
 Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, Naoya Horiguchi
 <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>,
 Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
 Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, damon@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] mm: introduce leaf entry type and use to simplify
 leaf entry logic

On 05.11.25 20:52, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 02:25:34PM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 07:06:11PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 12:31:43PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>>>> The kernel maintains leaf page table entries which contain either:
>>>>
>>>> - Nothing ('none' entries)
>>>> - Present entries (that is stuff the hardware can navigate without fault)
>>>> - Everything else that will cause a fault which the kernel handles
>>>
>>> The problem is that we're already using 'pmd leaf entries' to mean "this
>>> is a pointer to a PMD entry rather than a table of PTEs".
>>
>> Having not looked at the implications of this for leafent_t prototypes
>> ...
>> Can't this be solved by just adding a leafent type "Pointer" which
>> implies there's exactly one leaf-ent type which won't cause faults?
>>
>> is_present() => (table_ptr || leafent_ptr)
>> else():      => !leafent_ptr
>>
>> if is_none()
>> 	do the none-thing
>> if is_present()
>> 	if is_leafent(ent)  (== is_leafent_ptr)
>> 		do the pointer thing
>> 	else
>> 		do the table thing
>> else()
>> 	type = leafent_type(ent)
>> 	switch(type)
>> 		do the software things
>> 		can't be a present entry (see above)
>>
>>
>> A leaf is a leaf :shrug:
>>
>> ~Gregory
> 
> I thought about doing this but it doesn't really work as the type is
> _abstracted_ from the architecture-specific value, _and_ we use what is
> currently the swp_type field to identify what this is.
> 
> So we would lose the architecture-specific information that any 'hardware leaf'
> entry would require and not be able to reliably identify it without losing bits.
> 
> Trying to preserve the value _and_ correctly identify it as a present entry
> would be difficult.
> 
> And I _really_ didn't want to go on a deep dive through all the architectures to
> see if we could encode it differently to allow for this.
> 
> Rather I think it's better to differentiate between s/w + h/w leaf entries.

(Being rather silent because I'm busy with all kinds of other stuff)

I agree :)

As Willy said, something that spells out "sw leaf" would be nice.

-- 
Cheers

David


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ