[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQutTbzS8rfW-Esm@geday>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 17:02:21 -0300
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@...il.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: align bindings to PCIe spec
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 04:56:36PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> 在 2025/11/05 星期三 16:18, Geraldo Nascimento 写道:
> >
> > Hi Shawn, glad to hear from you.
> >
> > Perhaps the following change is better? It resolves the issue
> > without the added complication of open drain. After you questioned
> > if open drain is actually part of the spec, I remembered that
> > GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN is actually (GPIO_SINGLE_ENDED | GPIO_LINE_OPEN_DRAIN)
> > so I decided to test with just GPIO_SINGLE_ENDED and it works.
>
>
> Does that work for you too?
>
> &pcie0 {
> ep-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> num-lanes = <4>;
> - pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqnb_cpm>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqnb_cpm>, <&pcie_perst>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>; /* VCC_0V9_S0 */
> vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>; /* VCC_1V8_S0 */
> @@ -408,6 +408,10 @@ pcie {
> pcie_pwr: pcie-pwr {
> rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PD4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
> };
> + pcie_perst: pcie-perst {
> + rockchip,pins = <0 RK_PB4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
> + };
> +
> };
Hi Shawn,
No, that does not work.
I believe the pull-up mux became needed because I was forcing open drain
on PERST#.
Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento
Powered by blists - more mailing lists