| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20251105201035.64043-5-david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:10:30 +0000
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>,
u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com,
Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@...omium.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 next 4/9] lib: Add mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64() and mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup()
The existing mul_u64_u64_div_u64() rounds down, a 'rounding up'
variant needs 'divisor - 1' adding in between the multiply and
divide so cannot easily be done by a caller.
Add mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(a, b, c, d) that calculates (a * b + c)/d
and implement the 'round down' and 'round up' using it.
Update the x86-64 asm to optimise for 'c' being a constant zero.
Add kerndoc definitions for all three functions.
Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
---
Changes for v2 (formally patch 1/3):
- Reinstate the early call to div64_u64() on 32bit when 'c' is zero.
Although I'm not convinced the path is common enough to be worth
the two ilog2() calls.
Changes for v3 (formally patch 3/4):
- The early call to div64_u64() has been removed by patch 3.
Pretty much guaranteed to be a pessimisation.
Changes for v4:
- For x86-64 split the multiply, add and divide into three asm blocks.
(gcc makes a pigs breakfast of (u128)a * b + c)
- Change the kerndoc since divide by zero will (probably) fault.
Changes for v5:
- Fix test that excludes the add/adc asm block for constant zero 'add'.
arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h | 20 +++++++++------
include/linux/math64.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
lib/math/div64.c | 14 ++++++-----
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h
index 9931e4c7d73f..6d8a3de3f43a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/div64.h
@@ -84,21 +84,25 @@ static inline u64 mul_u32_u32(u32 a, u32 b)
* Will generate an #DE when the result doesn't fit u64, could fix with an
* __ex_table[] entry when it becomes an issue.
*/
-static inline u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 mul, u64 div)
+static inline u64 mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(u64 rax, u64 mul, u64 add, u64 div)
{
- u64 q;
+ u64 rdx;
- asm ("mulq %2; divq %3" : "=a" (q)
- : "a" (a), "rm" (mul), "rm" (div)
- : "rdx");
+ asm ("mulq %[mul]" : "+a" (rax), "=d" (rdx) : [mul] "rm" (mul));
- return q;
+ if (!statically_true(!add))
+ asm ("addq %[add], %[lo]; adcq $0, %[hi]" :
+ [lo] "+r" (rax), [hi] "+r" (rdx) : [add] "irm" (add));
+
+ asm ("divq %[div]" : "+a" (rax), "+d" (rdx) : [div] "rm" (div));
+
+ return rax;
}
-#define mul_u64_u64_div_u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64
+#define mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64 mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64
static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_div(u64 a, u32 mul, u32 div)
{
- return mul_u64_u64_div_u64(a, mul, div);
+ return mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(a, mul, 0, div);
}
#define mul_u64_u32_div mul_u64_u32_div
diff --git a/include/linux/math64.h b/include/linux/math64.h
index 6aaccc1626ab..e889d850b7f1 100644
--- a/include/linux/math64.h
+++ b/include/linux/math64.h
@@ -282,7 +282,53 @@ static inline u64 mul_u64_u32_div(u64 a, u32 mul, u32 divisor)
}
#endif /* mul_u64_u32_div */
-u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 mul, u64 div);
+/**
+ * mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64 - unsigned 64bit multiply, add, and divide
+ * @a: first unsigned 64bit multiplicand
+ * @b: second unsigned 64bit multiplicand
+ * @c: unsigned 64bit addend
+ * @d: unsigned 64bit divisor
+ *
+ * Multiply two 64bit values together to generate a 128bit product
+ * add a third value and then divide by a fourth.
+ * The Generic code divides by 0 if @d is zero and returns ~0 on overflow.
+ * Architecture specific code may trap on zero or overflow.
+ *
+ * Return: (@a * @b + @c) / @d
+ */
+u64 mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c, u64 d);
+
+/**
+ * mul_u64_u64_div_u64 - unsigned 64bit multiply and divide
+ * @a: first unsigned 64bit multiplicand
+ * @b: second unsigned 64bit multiplicand
+ * @d: unsigned 64bit divisor
+ *
+ * Multiply two 64bit values together to generate a 128bit product
+ * and then divide by a third value.
+ * The Generic code divides by 0 if @d is zero and returns ~0 on overflow.
+ * Architecture specific code may trap on zero or overflow.
+ *
+ * Return: @a * @b / @d
+ */
+#define mul_u64_u64_div_u64(a, b, d) mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(a, b, 0, d)
+
+/**
+ * mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup - unsigned 64bit multiply and divide rounded up
+ * @a: first unsigned 64bit multiplicand
+ * @b: second unsigned 64bit multiplicand
+ * @d: unsigned 64bit divisor
+ *
+ * Multiply two 64bit values together to generate a 128bit product
+ * and then divide and round up.
+ * The Generic code divides by 0 if @d is zero and returns ~0 on overflow.
+ * Architecture specific code may trap on zero or overflow.
+ *
+ * Return: (@a * @b + @d - 1) / @d
+ */
+#define mul_u64_u64_div_u64_roundup(a, b, d) \
+ ({ u64 _tmp = (d); mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(a, b, _tmp - 1, _tmp); })
+
/**
* DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP - unsigned 64bit divide with 64bit divisor rounded up
diff --git a/lib/math/div64.c b/lib/math/div64.c
index 4a4b1aa9e6e1..a88391b8ada0 100644
--- a/lib/math/div64.c
+++ b/lib/math/div64.c
@@ -183,13 +183,13 @@ u32 iter_div_u64_rem(u64 dividend, u32 divisor, u64 *remainder)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(iter_div_u64_rem);
-#ifndef mul_u64_u64_div_u64
-u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 d)
+#ifndef mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64
+u64 mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 c, u64 d)
{
#if defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__)
/* native 64x64=128 bits multiplication */
- u128 prod = (u128)a * b;
+ u128 prod = (u128)a * b + c;
u64 n_lo = prod, n_hi = prod >> 64;
#else
@@ -198,8 +198,10 @@ u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 d)
u32 a_lo = a, a_hi = a >> 32, b_lo = b, b_hi = b >> 32;
u64 x, y, z;
- x = (u64)a_lo * b_lo;
- y = (u64)a_lo * b_hi + (u32)(x >> 32);
+ /* Since (x-1)(x-1) + 2(x-1) == x.x - 1 two u32 can be added to a u64 */
+ x = (u64)a_lo * b_lo + (u32)c;
+ y = (u64)a_lo * b_hi + (u32)(c >> 32);
+ y += (u32)(x >> 32);
z = (u64)a_hi * b_hi + (u32)(y >> 32);
y = (u64)a_hi * b_lo + (u32)y;
z += (u32)(y >> 32);
@@ -265,5 +267,5 @@ u64 mul_u64_u64_div_u64(u64 a, u64 b, u64 d)
return res;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mul_u64_u64_div_u64);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mul_u64_add_u64_div_u64);
#endif
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists