[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251105202000.2700370-2-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 12:19:57 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] rcu: use WRITE_ONCE() for ->next and ->pprev of hlist_nulls
From: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
In rculist_nulls.h we can still see ordinary assignments to ->pprev and
->next of hlist_nulls.
As noted in the two patches below:
commit efd04f8a8b45 ("rcu: Use WRITE_ONCE() for assignments to ->next for
rculist_nulls")
commit 860c8802ace1 ("rcu: Use WRITE_ONCE() for assignments to ->pprev for
hlist_nulls")
We should use WRITE_ONCE().
Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/rculist_nulls.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
index 89186c499dd4..d5a656cc4c6a 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist_nulls.h
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline void hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n,
if (last) {
WRITE_ONCE(n->next, last->next);
- n->pprev = &last->next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(n->pprev, &last->next);
rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_nulls_next_rcu(last), n);
} else {
hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(n, h);
@@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ static inline void hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu(struct hlist_nulls_node *n,
/* after that hlist_nulls_del will work */
static inline void hlist_nulls_add_fake(struct hlist_nulls_node *n)
{
- n->pprev = &n->next;
- n->next = (struct hlist_nulls_node *)NULLS_MARKER(NULL);
+ WRITE_ONCE(n->pprev, &n->next);
+ WRITE_ONCE(n->next, (struct hlist_nulls_node *)NULLS_MARKER(NULL));
}
/**
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists