lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c686a971-1483-42c0-8199-376d4d4b3875@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 12:45:15 -0800
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>
To: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
 acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
 alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
 adrian.hunter@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, song@...nel.org,
 ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
 kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] perf: Refactor get_perf_callchain



On 10/28/25 9:25 AM, Tao Chen wrote:
>  From BPF stack map, we want to use our own buffers to avoid
> unnecessary copy and ensure that the buffer will not be
> overwritten by other preemptive tasks. Peter suggested
> provide more flexible stack-sampling APIs, which can be used
> in BPF, and we can still use the perf callchain entry with
> the help of these APIs. The next patch will modify the BPF part.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
> ---
>   include/linux/perf_event.h | 11 +++++-
>   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c      |  4 +-
>   kernel/events/callchain.c  | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>   kernel/events/core.c       |  2 +-
>   4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index fd1d91017b9..14a382cad1d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx {
>   	u32				nr;
>   	short				contexts;
>   	bool				contexts_maxed;
> +	bool				add_mark;
>   };
>   
>   typedef unsigned long (*perf_copy_f)(void *dst, const void *src,
> @@ -1718,9 +1719,17 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct perf_callchain_entry, perf_callchain_entry);
>   
>   extern void perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
>   extern void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
> +extern void __init_perf_callchain_ctx(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx,
> +				      struct perf_callchain_entry *entry,
> +				      u32 max_stack, bool add_mark);
> +
> +extern void __get_perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +extern void __get_perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
>   extern struct perf_callchain_entry *
>   get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
> -		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark);
> +		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask);
>   extern int get_callchain_buffers(int max_stack);
>   extern void put_callchain_buffers(void);
>   extern struct perf_callchain_entry *get_callchain_entry(int *rctx);
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index 4d53cdd1374..e28b35c7e0b 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_stackid, struct pt_regs *, regs, struct bpf_map *, map,
>   		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
>   
>   	trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
> -				   false, false);
> +				   false);

This is not a refactor. Here, the add_mark parameter is removed. The 'add_mark'
value here is expected to be false, but later get_perf_callchain(...) has 'add_mark'
is true in __init_perf_callchain_ctx().

Applying this patch only on top of bpf-next master branch, we will have the
following crash:

[  457.730077] bpf_testmod: oh no, recursing into test_1, recursion_misses 1
[  460.221871] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffa3bfffffff000
[  460.221912] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[  460.221912] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[  460.221912] PGD 1e0ef1067 P4D 1e0ef0067 PUD 1e0eef067 PMD 1e0eee067 PTE 0
[  460.221912] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
[  460.221912] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 2012 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G        W  OE       6.18.0-rc4-gafe2e8
[  460.221912] Tainted: [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
[  460.221912] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-pr4
[  460.221912] RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x183/0x2c0
[  460.221912] Code: 41 bf 08 00 00 00 41 29 ef 4d 01 fb 4d 29 de 4d 89 f4 4d 8d 6c 24 07 4d 85 e4 4d 0fd
[  460.221912] RSP: 0018:ff110001193bfc78 EFLAGS: 00010206
[  460.221912] RAX: ffd1ffffffd5b301 RBX: dffffc0000000001 RCX: ffffffff819a2ecb
[  460.221912] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000000ffffffb0 RDI: ffd1ffffffd5b360
[  460.221912] RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: ffd20000ffd5b30f R09: 1ffa40001ffab661
[  460.221912] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffa3bfffffab670 R12: 000000001ffffff2
[  460.221912] R13: 0000000003ff58cc R14: 0000000000053990 R15: 0000000000000000
[  460.221912] FS:  00007f358c6460c0(0000) GS:ff110002384b4000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  460.221912] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  460.221912] CR2: fffa3bfffffff000 CR3: 000000011468c006 CR4: 0000000000371ef0
[  460.221912] Call Trace:
[  460.221912]  <TASK>
[  460.221912]  __asan_memset+0x22/0x50
[  460.221912]  __bpf_get_stack+0x6eb/0x7a0
[  460.221912]  ? bpf_perf_event_output_raw_tp+0x58c/0x6c0
[  460.221912]  bpf_get_stack+0x1d/0x30
[  460.221912]  bpf_get_stack_raw_tp+0x148/0x180
[  460.221912]  bpf_prog_40e346a03dc2914c_bpf_prog1+0x169/0x1af
[  460.221912]  bpf_trace_run2+0x1bc/0x350
[  460.221912]  ? bpf_trace_run2+0x104/0x350
[  460.221912]  ? trace_sys_enter+0x6b/0xf0
[  460.221912]  __bpf_trace_sys_enter+0x38/0x60
[  460.221912]  trace_sys_enter+0xa7/0xf0
[  460.221912]  syscall_trace_enter+0xfc/0x160
[  460.221912]  ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  460.221912]  do_syscall_64+0x5a/0xfa0
[  460.221912]  ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[  460.221912]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

>   
>   	if (unlikely(!trace))
>   		/* couldn't fetch the stack trace */
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>   		trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
>   	else
>   		trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user, max_depth,
> -					   crosstask, false);
> +					   crosstask);
>   
>   	if (unlikely(!trace) || trace->nr < skip) {
>   		if (may_fault)
> diff --git a/kernel/events/callchain.c b/kernel/events/callchain.c
> index 808c0d7a31f..2c36e490625 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
> @@ -216,13 +216,54 @@ static void fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(struct perf_callchain_entry *entr
>   #endif
>   }
>   
> +void __init_perf_callchain_ctx(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx,
> +			       struct perf_callchain_entry *entry,
> +			       u32 max_stack, bool add_mark)
> +
> +{
> +	ctx->entry		= entry;
> +	ctx->max_stack		= max_stack;
> +	ctx->nr			= entry->nr = 0;
> +	ctx->contexts		= 0;
> +	ctx->contexts_maxed	= false;
> +	ctx->add_mark		= add_mark;
> +}
> +
> +void __get_perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	if (user_mode(regs))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (ctx->add_mark)
> +		perf_callchain_store_context(ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_KERNEL);
> +	perf_callchain_kernel(ctx, regs);
> +}
> +
> +void __get_perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ctx, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	int start_entry_idx;
> +
> +	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
> +		if (current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_USER_WORKER))
> +			return;
> +		regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ctx->add_mark)
> +		perf_callchain_store_context(ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_USER);
> +
> +	start_entry_idx = ctx->nr;
> +	perf_callchain_user(ctx, regs);
> +	fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(ctx->entry, start_entry_idx);
> +}
> +
>   struct perf_callchain_entry *
>   get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
> -		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask, bool add_mark)
> +		   u32 max_stack, bool crosstask)
>   {
>   	struct perf_callchain_entry *entry;
>   	struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx ctx;
> -	int rctx, start_entry_idx;
> +	int rctx;
>   
>   	/* crosstask is not supported for user stacks */
>   	if (crosstask && user && !kernel)
> @@ -232,34 +273,14 @@ get_perf_callchain(struct pt_regs *regs, bool kernel, bool user,
>   	if (!entry)
>   		return NULL;
>   
> -	ctx.entry		= entry;
> -	ctx.max_stack		= max_stack;
> -	ctx.nr			= entry->nr = 0;
> -	ctx.contexts		= 0;
> -	ctx.contexts_maxed	= false;
> +	__init_perf_callchain_ctx(&ctx, entry, max_stack, true);
>   
> -	if (kernel && !user_mode(regs)) {
> -		if (add_mark)
> -			perf_callchain_store_context(&ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_KERNEL);
> -		perf_callchain_kernel(&ctx, regs);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (user && !crosstask) {
> -		if (!user_mode(regs)) {
> -			if (current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_USER_WORKER))
> -				goto exit_put;
> -			regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> -		}
> +	if (kernel)
> +		__get_perf_callchain_kernel(&ctx, regs);
>   
> -		if (add_mark)
> -			perf_callchain_store_context(&ctx, PERF_CONTEXT_USER);
> -
> -		start_entry_idx = entry->nr;
> -		perf_callchain_user(&ctx, regs);
> -		fixup_uretprobe_trampoline_entries(entry, start_entry_idx);
> -	}
> +	if (user && !crosstask)
> +		__get_perf_callchain_user(&ctx, regs);
>   
> -exit_put:
>   	put_callchain_entry(rctx);
>   
>   	return entry;
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 7541f6f85fc..eb0f110593d 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -8218,7 +8218,7 @@ perf_callchain(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs)
>   		return &__empty_callchain;
>   
>   	callchain = get_perf_callchain(regs, kernel, user,
> -				       max_stack, crosstask, true);
> +				       max_stack, crosstask);
>   	return callchain ?: &__empty_callchain;
>   }
>   


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ