[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd9Au1LoZjjx07TFm0E6GbfXZ_UFp+pyQT7J_GO-L5joDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 08:54:14 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the exfat tree
On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 8:13 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
Hi Stephen,
>
> The following commit is also in the vfs-brauner-fixes tree as a different
> commit (but the same patch):
>
> 772a65ec60d5 ("exfat: check return value of sb_min_blocksize in exfat_read_boot_sector")
I have removed it in my tree.
>
> This is commit
>
> f2c1f631630e ("exfat: check return value of sb_min_blocksize in exfat_read_boot_sector")
>
> in the vfs-brauner-fixes tree.
Christian, Please add my acked-by tag to this patch.
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
Thanks!
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists